Let me know if this is a straw man:
Submitted by James X. on Tue, 09/25/2007 - 5:45am.

Jaquiss can defend himself if he wants, but if the people he chose to quote in his print article are any indication, it appears what Jaquiss would argue is that Adams showed poor judgment, at least as it pertains to public perception, and that the public should be informed of that.

I would counter that if public perception is the issue, Jaquiss tried to shape how the public perceived the rumor, but that with the potential exception of some Lars Larson listeners, the public does not perceive the rumor to be true. And if Ball doesn't, why should anyone?

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Voting controls can be added to this post.
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
More information about formatting options