I know he's no Kulo fan (who is?) and he is ready to lead the lynch mob against Neal (who isn't?). But isn't this over the top — especially since it involves granting some measure of veracity to anything Lars says?
Just a sample of Steve's snarl:
Kulongoski appointed Goldschmidt to head the Higher Ed board because he (a) didn't care that Goldschmidt raped a 14-year-old girl; or (b) didn't think the story would ever become public. Now the Kulongoski apologists are arguing the governor couldn't possibly have been that stupid or immoral.
Wanna bet?
I don't know the fully story, and I'm willing to believe Kulo is as guilty as Duin wants us to believe. But is the spewing of such anger an indication that Duin's head is going to explode and he should be kept away from small children and valuable objects?
Automatic: if Sizemore says it, If Lars says it, and now if Duin says it, it must be lies or bias.
To hell with truth or facts, just keep the blinders on and head in the sand... isn't accountability and fact the issue?
Sounds like these people were fine proponents of Goldie.