Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 05/09/2008 - 10:23am.

If a news organization is told by the officials that they were shot, that is what they report. And when they are told by the officials well, oops they weren't, they reported that as well. Maybe you need to watch a bit more news to keep up.

http://www.kptv.com/news/16190035/detail.html

http://www.kgw.com/news-local/stories/kgw_050708_news_sea_lions_not_shot...

http://www.koin.com/news/national/story.aspx?content_id=5AAEEAFF-652B-48...

http://www.katu.com/news/local/18729684.html

So who secifically didn't cover this newer development? Since what I can find is four TV stations that did. If you are going to slam the media, you might want to have some facts to back up your sayings, like I did. All four of those links talk about the fact that now it is being said that the sea lions were NOT shot at this time. Come on, what you gonna say next hot shot? I bet you're the same 17 year old who came on here complaining about the on air talent in this market when you have NO life experience in anything except how to be a teenager in the late 2000's.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Voting controls can be added to this post.
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
More information about formatting options