Has the Media Abdicated on Political Coverage?

Submitted by LynnS on Wed, 09/27/2006 - 2:47pm.

The Bend Bulletin's James Sinks this so, and apparently a lot of you do too since I've been sent this link a number of times today:

The media — once considered the "fourth estate" because of their important role — today are presenting a skewed view of government, if any at all. And citizens aren’t as equipped to make critical decisions because they are less likely to know how government works and how decisions affect them personally.

It's a devastating critique. Every ND, producer, editor and publisher should read it--and then do something about it.

( topics: )
Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 09/27/2006 - 4:02pm.

Is this a surprise? It shouldn't be.
Large corporations only exist for their own good; that would apply to all local media owners at least in television. So there is no "responsibility" to the public good in their eyes.
Try renting a documentary called THE CORPORATION. It basically points out that a corporation is a sociopath, only interested in it's own welfare. It's pretty disturbing.

I didn't say "all corporations are evil", I'm just stating the facts.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 09/27/2006 - 4:20pm.

Excerpt from the article:

The only Oregon television station with a full-time Capitol presence is Portland-based KATU-TV, which had shut down its Capitol bureau but reopened it full time in 2000.

Roberta Altstadt, executive producer at the network, said viewers might be turned off by the word ?politics,? but they are keenly interested in the decisions made by politicians, such as funding schools, protecting air quality and regulating payday loan businesses.

Although Altstadt likes to air exclusive stories from Salem, the public would benefit if all news outlets took a bigger interest in government, she said.

?It would be better for every Oregonian if all the news organizations were down there showcasing what politicians are doing or not doing,? she said.

Submitted by LynnS on Wed, 09/27/2006 - 4:49pm.

...the day she was apparently let go.

-----
Lynn Siprelle * Fairy Blogmother

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 09/27/2006 - 4:50pm.

Anyone see any connection between the comment above and the KATU News item posted earlier today?

Submitted by rocky on Wed, 09/27/2006 - 7:27pm.

I hope someone gives us the low down and maybe an interview with Roberta Altstadt. I'm going to see if I can find a copy of the documentary The Corporation.
Remember Willie Weak, Big O, and the rest do not damage the good-will of advertisers. Truth is always secondary to money.
Guess why Telly news is only about human failings?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 09/27/2006 - 7:52pm.

TV quit covering government and poltics years ago. Radio was first, then TV and don't look now but your newspaper (The O) is getting pretty short on coverage too.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 09/27/2006 - 9:43pm.

The Salem Statesman Journal appears to desperate to make its website appear "updated" it's running government written press releases UN-edited under the heading of "News Updates."

Note today's word for word identical comparison of their "polticial reporting":

PRESS RELEASE:
Attorney General Hardy Myers announced today he will be releasing his
first-ever report on organized crime in Oregon in an effort to heighten
awareness about common misconceptions, what it is, how widespread it is, and
how law enforcement is responding to it. The Department of Justice reviewed
and compiled crime information linked to street gangs, drug trafficking
organizations, terrorists and outlaw motorcycle gangs operating around the
state. AG Myers will share the results of this research and his
recommendations to combat organized crime in Oregon.
Date: Thursday, September 28, 2006
Time: 11:00 a.m., State Capitol Press Room Salem,
Oregon
Copies of the report will be available.

STATESMAN.COM:
http://statesmanjournal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060927/UPDATE/6...
022
Report released Thursday on organized crime in Oregon
4:42 p.m.
September 27, 2006
Oregon Attorney General Hardy Myers announced today he will release his
first-ever report on organized crime in Oregon in an effort to heighten
awareness about common misconceptions, what it is, how widespread it is, and
how law enforcement is responding to it.
The report will be released at 11 a.m. Thursday, at a press conference at
the Capitol.
The Department of Justice reviewed and compiled crime information linked to
street gangs, drug trafficking organizations, terrorists and outlaw
motorcycle gangs operating around Oregon. Myers will share the results of
this research and his recommendations to combat organized crime in Oregon.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 09/28/2006 - 4:29pm.

Senator Trent Lott just left a White House meeting with the President, according to MSNBC.

Reporters asked him if they talked about the war in Iraq.

Lott said no, nobody at The White House or in America really cares about that.

While Bob Woodward's new book points out there is an attack on US soldiers in Iraq every fifteen minutes.

Bye arm! So long leg. Face? Where my face?

MSM=DOA on biggest story of their entire lives.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 09/28/2006 - 9:19pm.

The freaking war is front page news every day. Please point me to a source where Lott actually said that "nobody at The White House or in America really cares about that." Or is that your biased take on what Lott said?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 09/28/2006 - 9:23pm.

Shouldn'ta shot my mouth off without doing some checking first:

Trent Lott = Asshat

[...]

President Bush barely mentioned the war in Iraq when he met with Republican senators behind closed doors in the Capitol Thursday morning and was not asked about the course of the war, Sen. Trent Lott, R-Mississippi, said.

"No, none of that," Lott told reporters after the session when asked if the Iraq war was discussed. "You're the only ones who obsess on that. We don't and the real people out in the real world don't for the most part."

Lott went on to say he has difficulty understanding the motivations behind the violence in Iraq.

Source: CNN Politics

[Edited for long url--L]

Submitted by tvprintradio on Fri, 09/29/2006 - 10:29am.

about Iraq, huh Trent?
oh, and the maimed for life. nice to know it doesn't bother you, Trent.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 09/29/2006 - 8:01am.

In todays media world, a lot of people consume media to reaffirm, not inform. Anyone doing real solid objective reporting today will get slapped with ignorance bias labels that will hurt their overall audience.

There is a lot of bad news and nobody wants it.

Better to keep coverage light, jump on the occasional big story and add lots of politically neutral material of interest. Bland appeals to everyone.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 09/29/2006 - 9:38am.

I agree completely. With so many outlets available to people, from blogs to radio, to TV, people rush to reaffirm their already existing beliefs.
It's a shame that informative objective reporting (and consequently the media consumer) is the casuality in all this.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 09/29/2006 - 9:52am.

Temporary profits vs. real journalism and long-term service to the community. We all understand. They've been signing their own death warrants for a long time now. When their profit center dries up, perhaps they'll change.
As long as corporations run things, it will just get worse. I don't know anybody who relies on local news for their information. I doubt if you do, either.
People who post here pathetically complain about the age of "graphics packages" while their audiences go down the drain.
It's not only state politics that doesn't get covered. There is absolutely no arts coverage on local news, and to look at the folks doing the reporting, I'm sure they have a cultural frame of reference of about twenty minutes.

Submitted by thedude on Fri, 09/29/2006 - 11:37am.

I'm not from the Portland area, but everytime I pick up an Oregonian or one of the indie papers I see arts coverage. Same with NPR, I usually hear something artsy.
You must be talking about T.V. I have no opinion there since I canceled cable and Seaside does not get the networks.

A more ON-topic note: I agree with the column by the Bulletin guy. It's nice to hear a paper guy calling out his peers on getting their acts together.

Submitted by tvprintradio on Sat, 09/30/2006 - 11:23am.

i meant TV....radio too. even OPB radio has virtually no arts coverage.

Submitted by bigboy on Fri, 09/29/2006 - 2:05pm.

Yes, the media have done a lousy job with government/political coverage but in this age of Internet, cable TV, political books, documentaries, etc. there is just no excuse for citizens to be so uninformed and misinformed. Yes, the signal to noise ratio is lousy, but if you gather information from enough sources and have an open mind, you can begin to get a accurate picture.

It is truly alarming when 31% of people polled today still believe Saddam Hussein was personally involved in the 9/11 attacks.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/politics/20060919_poll_results...

This is not the fault of The Oregonian, The Wall Street Journal, KATU or NBC Nightly news.

If anything, the people in this country have abdicated the responsibility to be informed.

Submitted by potatohead on Sat, 09/30/2006 - 10:04am.

...supportable position.

We used to have legislation in place to insure the public interest was somewhat protected. It came with problems, but it did set the social norm for people to be well informed.

That was things like the fairness doctrine.

Today there is no such norm. This too brings problems along for the ride.

We've traded entertainment value for being well informed. That's a different value judgement and that's where the harm comes from.

We've a ton of sources for news and information, but we don't have any incentive to consume those in any way other than our personal satisfaction. For most people that's entertainment, which means reaffirmation, not information. Readers here are quite likely to:

-be old enough for the old norms to still hold some value

-be the type of person who values being well informed

-are not totally ignorant.

Consider joe bag 'o dougnuts though. Is he really going to dig into the news, looking for trouble after a long and hard workday that sucks?

Submitted by bigboy on Sun, 10/01/2006 - 9:22pm.

There is no excuse to be uninformed. Got a lousy job and you're tired at the end of the day? Tough shit. Join the club. No fairness doctrine anymore? (which I would really question whether that made for a more informed citizenry). Suck it up. No one is going to stay up nights worried about whether you are getting the information you need. You gotta do it yourself.

Submitted by rfaaberg on Mon, 10/02/2006 - 12:04am.

Shouldn't it be "Have the Media Abdicated on Political Coverage?" instead of "Has the Media Abdicated on Political Coverage?"?

"Have" instead of "Has" since "Media" is a plural noun, in other words...

No offense intended.

Rick

Submitted by LynnS on Mon, 10/02/2006 - 8:42am.

;)

Your point, and no offense, taken.

-----
Lynn Siprelle * Fairy Blogmother

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Voting controls can be added to this post.
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
More information about formatting options