May 2007 Demo Ratings

Submitted by pdxtvwatcher on Sun, 07/01/2007 - 11:31am.

Here are a few selected newscasts and their Adults 25-54 demo ratings from the May 2007 book:

5-6am:
KATU - 0
KOIN - 0
KGW - 1
KPTV - 2

6-7am:
KATU - 1
KOIN - 0
KGW - 3
KPTV - 3

Noon:
KATU - 0
KOIN - 0
KGW - 1

5pm:
KATU - 1
KOIN - 1
KGW - 4

6pm:
KOIN - 1
KGW - 3

6:30pm:
KATU - 2
KGW - 3

10pm:
KPTV - 5
KRCW - 1

11pm:
KATU - 2
KOIN - 2
KGW - 4
KPTV - 2

Some other notes:
- KPTV's 4:30(AM) got a 1
- KATU's 4:30(PM) got a 0
- KPTV's 9am "Better" got a 1; KATU's 9am "AMNW" got a 0
- KPTV's 7-9am "GDO" got a 2, while KGW/NBC's "Today" got a 3

( topics: | | | )
Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 07/01/2007 - 8:22pm.

haha. no wonder people don't watch KOIN, you should have seen their 6pm news tonight. techincal difficulty after techincal difficulty. it was worse than watching public access television. i don't understand why advertisers still pay for time during their news.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 07/01/2007 - 11:26pm.

"i don't understand why advertisers still pay for time during their news."

With those demos, KOIN pays the advertisers!

Submitted by LynnS on Mon, 07/02/2007 - 8:58am.

...cue the KOIN ad guy...

-----
Lynn Siprelle * Fairy Blogmother

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 07/02/2007 - 10:36pm.

has changed his tune.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 07/02/2007 - 12:08am.

Does that mean the same thing as technical?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 07/01/2007 - 11:58pm.

KGW is giving KPTV a run for there money in the 6a hour.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 07/02/2007 - 9:31am.

One hour. They tied in the demos during one hour. Yeah, that's a real run at em.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 07/02/2007 - 2:03am.

Needs to pull the plug and just start running Judge Judy re-runs. Has anyone noticed that a lot of people are jumping the KOIN ship lately? Where are they going?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 07/02/2007 - 9:58am.

Any word on when the KOIN anchors contracts run out? Can't believe 6 won't just chuck everything and start over at this point.

Submitted by pdxtvwatcher on Tue, 07/03/2007 - 11:11am.

If memory serves... Kelley (re)joined KOIN in August 2004. She most likely signed either a 3 or 4 year agreement -- meaning that it's up this summer or next.

When Jeff arrived at KOIN in 1998, Pete Schulberg (writing for the Oregonian at the time) reported that Jeff signed a 6 year agreement with KOIN. I remember reading that in 2004, he re-signed for another lengthy term -- "into the next decade" was the phrase used, if I recall correctly.

The word on the street over the years is that the language in their contracts is such that KOIN cannot easily terminate the agreements.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 07/02/2007 - 7:16pm.

what does the 0,1,2,3 mean...

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 07/03/2007 - 10:03am.

The "rating" (as opposed to "share") indicates the percentage of the market in the listed demo (25-54) who watched at least 5 minutes during the time period listed.

Rating = viewership divided by population
Share = viewership divided by population watching any TV

So at 4 am you could have a 40 share of those watching, and a 1 or a .5 or smaller rating..... since very few folks are actually watching at that time.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 07/03/2007 - 1:50pm.

What is a 1? I believe one point is equal to about 10 thousand homes. Correct me if that number has changed.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 07/02/2007 - 7:23pm.

Their reporters try to compete, but they don't have much support.
I caught part of that disaster over the weekend, and there wasn't much that Ken or Alexis or the reporter in the field could do to save the ship from sinking. Thank goodness weather people can talk forever.
It's just one show, but even when the technical problems aren't there, there's just not much reason to watch them. Fox has a niche. KGW is winning the rest of the market, pretty much by default. They're the closest thing to a real TV newsroom we've got in this town,IMHO.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 07/03/2007 - 10:36am.

kgw copies what KPTV does though...

Submitted by Tv_Viewer on Tue, 07/03/2007 - 12:48pm.

Here you guys are once again bagging on KOIN. How about if we talk about how they could improve. I mean offer real ideas not snarky ones. I challenge everyone to do that.

Here is mine: Cover the stories in depth that no one else is covering. For example: that fact that the city of Portland lost a whole lot of money to an consultant since the fee they charged didn't equal the savings that they found. Here is a link to the story: http://tinyurl.com/yu79de

I don't work in the industry just a viewer who actually wants to see news during news casts.

Submitted by Myhousemf on Tue, 07/03/2007 - 1:18pm.

Well, you may have good ideas, but, you have to also have a realistic way to carry it out. KOIN doesn't really have the resources to go in depth. Do they?

Also, one thing I've never understood....it seems like it would be easy to let your reporters have more time for their packages (and i'm talking 3-6 minute packages or longer) and stories so you wouldn't have to fill up the rest of the newscast with junk. And if it ever got to the point where you couldn't actually fit all the stories in a newscast, then yay for you! You would actually have NEW content for the next newscast.

Boy, am I dreaming...

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 07/03/2007 - 2:17pm.

That sound you hear is the clicking of remotes acress the viewing area as viewers look for something faster paced and more interesting to them.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 07/03/2007 - 8:26pm.

Nonsense. I just sat through a two hour movie about a rat who can cook. People will sit still for a story well told. Countdown spends time on stories and even manages to include the fluff.

If you can't hold a viewer's attention for three minutes, you're a bad storyteller. Or your story wasn't worth telling in the first place.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 07/03/2007 - 8:41pm.

If the story is good, they will watch.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 07/03/2007 - 3:17pm.

Is that the future of TV news is in the morning. Consider this:
The top rated shows at 6am outperformed the majority of evening shows (5pm, 6pm etc), and tied the top rated show at 6pm (!!).
And I can't believe KPTV's 4:30 am show got the same number as KATUs 5pm. That is truly crazy.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 07/03/2007 - 3:55pm.

It's the only place where viewership is increasing. That's why it's so discouraging when KOIN and KATU don't compete with the big guns. When I watch those stations, it's like they've given-up in the morning news race. Get some watchable people!

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 07/05/2007 - 1:58pm.

Carl, Angelica and Rhonda?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 07/05/2007 - 2:40pm.

Katu finishes in a distant 3rd place.. and they're not gaining viewers with the current team. My question is how long does KATU stick with those 3?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 07/12/2007 - 5:49pm.

Carl and Rhonda are okay, but Angelica is really dull and run of the mill. She needs some energy. I think she would be better out in the field, where her roots are. I really believe they need a strong, experienced anchor in that spot. Maybe someone who has local roots or at least a local following.

Submitted by potatohead on Tue, 07/03/2007 - 7:17pm.

wrong topic

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 07/04/2007 - 2:09pm.

is constantly looking over its shoulder at KPTV. That's not up for debate. It's fact. Number one stations don't have to cherry pick talent from across the street like KGW did. Number one stations don't start asking its reporters to start using props and walking in standups like KGW has.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 07/04/2007 - 6:53pm.

Two words: shred day.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 07/04/2007 - 9:41pm.

But that's ok.. we're flattered really.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 07/05/2007 - 12:47pm.

KGW was the first to do a "shred day -- which is very successful. KGW did the first one so long ago.. those over at KPTV think they thought of it..

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 07/05/2007 - 1:15pm.

before paper was invented.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 07/04/2007 - 11:07pm.

Anonymous Source wrote:
is constantly looking over its shoulder at KPTV. That's not up for debate. It's fact. Number one stations don't have to cherry pick talent from across the street like KGW did. Number one stations don't start asking its reporters to start using props and walking in standups like KGW has.

FYI: Kgw has never had to cherry pick talent. Talent has always come to them because of their reputation as a company that respects talent and treats their employees well.
KGW started asking its reporters to use props and walking standups well before the comptition caught on.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 07/05/2007 - 9:51am.

KGW has been asking reporters to use props and walk during standups for the past decade or more. It's certainly nothing new and is something Magid (consultant) has been pushing forever.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 07/08/2007 - 3:27pm.

KGW used consultants. Consultants have been telling their clients to use props and walk in stand ups for 20+ years.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 07/04/2007 - 11:11pm.

KGW does this about about every two months.
Great promotional tool that involves thousands of viewers who remember the call letters and tune for the next chance to have their privaate correspondence shredded.
KPTV tried to do the same thing but a combination of low viewership of those who cared and location was a bust.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 07/05/2007 - 10:04am.

...viewers don't have anything to shred because they roll it up and smoke it !
The reason KPTV has big numbers, is because POrtland is 85 percent white trash...now there's a demo everybody wants in their billing books.
KGW has a much more intelligent...or shall I say, educated... following.
That's O-K for KPTV though too---look at how well NASCAR is doing nationwide with their moon-shine packin', chaw-spittin' fans.
It's all good. There's enough opossum pie and chitterlins' to go around for everybody to get stuffed at the trough of local TV news billing and revenue; Of course the hogs upstairs all stuff it in their pockets and buy their BMW's and Lexus SUV's...but that's another whole can of worms...

Submitted by LynnS on Thu, 07/05/2007 - 11:04am.

classist much?

-----
Lynn Siprelle * Fairy Blogmother

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 07/05/2007 - 11:07am.

ask the KGW elitist how well the 'White Trash' argument went with a local BMW dealer.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 07/05/2007 - 3:01pm.

A lot of sales types lurk here..

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 07/05/2007 - 2:33pm.

Portland IS white trash. Oh sure, there are small groups of non-WT folks. The so called "Cultural Elitists", Portland's growing "Creative Class" made up of writers and artists, as well as a few soccer families bumping around here and there. But, and it's a big one... a large part of the Portland Metro area is made up of lower middle class working poor who find it entertaining to see if one of their friends made on KPTV's Meth Watch. These folks are lighting up joints, drinking PBR, and snorting meth while they watch the news. Sweet. You are what you eat, and in this case you are what you watch!

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 07/05/2007 - 3:59pm.

Show me any market where the vast majority of folks aren't lower middle class people. Maybe not white, but most people period from Anchorage to Yreka are not upper crust wealthy folks.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 07/05/2007 - 4:40pm.

Was Portland filled with classy, educated people when KGW was number one (for years and years and years)? Or did they all move away a couple of years ago, leading to KGW's crash in the ratings? Please enlighten me.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 07/05/2007 - 5:11pm.

What numbers are you reading?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 07/05/2007 - 8:35pm.

The show that's been hurt the most by KPTV's growing numbers. You can't deny that their 11 O'Clock ratings have incredibly low. I don't remember them getting 4's and 5's (or lower) on such a regular basis. They can't claim number one late night anymore. You can't spin that one, can you?

Submitted by pdxtvwatcher on Sat, 07/07/2007 - 9:00pm.

I think it's clear the KPTV's entry into the 11pm contest has had an impact. KPTV is averaging a 3 rating... and, in my opinion, those viewers aren't "new" 11pm news viewers. Instead, they're 11pm news viewers who used to watch another station. In essence, KPTV has "stolen" 3 ratings points from KATU, KOIN and KGW at 11pm. I think you see the most loss from KGW, but that could also be due to NBC lead-in programming declines. Regardless, it doesn't cost KPTV much money at all to put that 11pm newscast on the air, yet it has hurt the other stations tremendously as measured by their ratings drops at 11pm in the past year. Contrast that to KPTV's jump from a 0 to a 3 rating.

Like 'em or hate 'em, KPTV is doing a lot of things right these days. Their 10pm news is the highest-rated and most profitable newscast in the market; GDO is making a killing with record-high morning numbers and advertising income; their 9am show is going to be syndicated nationally this fall; and KPTV's aforementioned 11pm show is stinging the competition... even though it finishes 4th in the time slot.

I think it's safe to say that KPTV has emerged to be the smartest-managed station in the market... despite the shortcomings that are so-often (and sometimes rightly) mentioned on this blog.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 07/07/2007 - 10:39pm.

KPTV hires part-time anchors. The whole thing will implode at some point. Sooner or later their employees will demand to be paid at least market wages for their work. Why do the people over there allow themselves to be hosed by a company that's making soooooooo much money. Are most of them too young to know any better? I don't get it.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 07/11/2007 - 4:58pm.

KPTV will have no shortage of decent talent for their shows no matter who leaves and who they do not replace. Any talent trying to work their way through the hundreds of small markets will no doubt take part-time work, or in a few cases work 10 hours a week, just to get into a market size 23. This creates younger, very ambitious talent willing to work for nothing. I miss the Kevin and Hillary weekends. Content was cheesy but talent was great.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 07/11/2007 - 7:06pm.

KPTV takes advantage of young, desperate people so they can avoid paying for health insurance and a 401k. What happens when that part-time employee gets sick? Do they have enough money to see a doctor? How about a hospital visit? Will we see KPTV employees on the Oregon Health Plan -- where the rest of us taxpayers pick up the tab because their TV station is too cheap to hire them full-time? The people at Meredith must be really proud!

Submitted by LynnS on Wed, 07/11/2007 - 8:51pm.

...that KPTV isn't offering insurance for this position? I'm just sayin'.

-----
Lynn Siprelle * Fairy Blogmother

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 07/11/2007 - 11:12pm.

The job will come with benefits.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 07/05/2007 - 9:56pm.

That must be a KPTVer's wet dream.

Submitted by Tv_Viewer on Fri, 07/06/2007 - 4:11pm.

Anonymous Source wrote:
Portland IS white trash. Oh sure, there are small groups of non-WT folks. The so called "Cultural Elitists", Portland's growing "Creative Class" made up of writers and artists, as well as a few soccer families bumping around here and there. But, and it's a big one... a large part of the Portland Metro area is made up of lower middle class working poor who find it entertaining to see if one of their friends made on KPTV's Meth Watch. These folks are lighting up joints, drinking PBR, and snorting meth while they watch the news. Sweet. You are what you eat, and in this case you are what you watch!

Thanks for using such a broad brush to paint us all. I'm nothing like this and everyone person that I know isn't either. Where are you hanging out. Thanks also for reminding me why I only watch KPTV for the weather.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 07/05/2007 - 9:15pm.

No, KGW is indeed #1 in just about every daypart. But c'mon, everyone, most network affiliate newscasts are directly related to their pre and post programming. You simply can't discount that. Last I heard, CBS was doing pretty poorly with their network programming, hurting their affiliates (including KOIN). However, KOIN is mostly to be blamed IMHO. As for the the 5pm newscasts, Oprah is who you want leading in. (Hmmm...isn't she on 8?)

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 07/06/2007 - 12:12am.

Yes, KGW is a solid station and has great numbers for the most part. But you can't deny they used to own late night, along with every other daypart. They don't anymore. And the white trash comment was targeted at the 10 O'Clock news, not GDO or any other newscast. So the question remains, when KGW ruled late night, were the viewers smarter, richer and classier than they are now? I don't think the WT argument holds up. Not only is it offensive, it's just down right wrong.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 07/06/2007 - 11:42am.

11PM ratings are dropping across the country.. and morning news numbers are rising.. People aren't staying up as late as they once did.. I know you'd love to give the credit to KPTV but it's a nationwide thing.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 07/06/2007 - 8:47am.

Holy crikey...what's with this "cage match" between KPTV & KGW? Don't you folks realize that viewers are watching BOTH stations?

Yes, KGW does some stuff well...so does KPTV...What's the big deal?

#1? In terms of what?

Morning shows? (according to the overnight ratings 75% to 80% of the entire population typically doesn't watch ANY morning TV)

As a salesperson in TV, I can tell you that the vast majority of advertisers want results...not ratings. Yes, it's lovely to have big numbers...but ANY station can deliver results because regardless of the station's ranking there will be oodles of people watching even the lowest-rated TV programs.

Honestly, the "we're #1" chest-thumping is tiresome...and it makes less difference than you might realize?!

I know that won't stop most of you from ridiculing my post...but I thought it might be helpful to add a little perspective from somebody that's "in the trenches" everyday.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 07/06/2007 - 10:18pm.

I doubt that the KGW'er was really from KGW.

That would require internet access :)

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 07/09/2007 - 6:11pm.

Problem for 2/6 and their low am demos is they can't sell them. The morning news is the new growth opportunity for stations and continued missteps by Koin/Katu to bolster and build am audiences is having an impact on their other news efforts. PDX is becoming a two station market and unless cash-strapped Fisher or clueless SJL [or whoever they sell to] comes up with a strategic plan backed by deep pockets and a commitment to rebuilding, the die has been cast. My guess, one station won't be in the news game in 18 months.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 07/11/2007 - 8:21pm.

Why isn't anyone talking about KPTV's complete dominance on Tuesday night. The tune-in alone is at least worth a mention. Going from a 2.4/5 to a 8.8/18 is pretty impressive for the station that only gets good ratings because of its strong lead-ins. Once again, it shows when there's a big story (weather), people tune to the #1 late news in Portland. No spin, no hype, just fact.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 07/11/2007 - 10:29pm.

Question - When does the new ND take the fall for the ratings slide that's happened during his reign at KATU? The station used to compete with KGW... now they're trying to keep pace with 4th place KOIN (which has 1/3 of the staff) I'd love to be a fly on the wall in John Tamerlano's office.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 07/12/2007 - 8:21am.

are a good tool to have in your tool box, but when they are " stole a purse like this one" people laugh.
Live shots are a tool too, but when the action is over and there is nothing to see..debateable.
Having reporters present the story is definitely a plus, but I don't think viewers care if it's on location or in studio, unless that location really means something.
We should have all the tools at our desposal, but whenever they are mandated, you see some silly stuff.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 07/12/2007 - 5:55pm.

I absolutely agree! I used to be in the business and seeing reporters hold up the mandated hub cap from the accident five hours earlier is beyond ridiculous. We literally laugh out loud and, by the way, miss the story because the reporter's credibility is shot.

Seriously....conduct polls, talk to your neighbor at Stumptown...whatever it takes to figure out what Portlanders want, because for the most part - you're all missing the boat.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Voting controls can be added to this post.
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
More information about formatting options