O: More on Restructuring (Updated and Bumped)

Submitted by LynnS on Wed, 07/18/2007 - 2:23pm.

No one at the O reads OMI.

That's clear, because even though I've asked a couple of times for info about the big restructuring, few have stepped up. Either that, or everyone's super happy about it and doesn't want to say anything.

Yeah, you're right, no one over there must read OMI.

ANYway, Scott Moore at the Merc knows one little bit of it, namely the fate of city hall beatsters/bloggers Ryan Frank and Anna Griffin:

Ryan Frank is heading to the business section to report on real estate and housing, and Anna Griffin will be doing more long-form pieces for the main news team. ...

Replacing them in the city bureau (on the first floor of city hall) will be Jim Mayer, an Oregonian vet who’s covered city hall and state politics in the past, and Andy Dworkin, a medical and health reporter. The changes apparently start this week, with the whole transition lasting a few.

Watch out for Scott, you two. He's that sneaky vegan on a bike.

Apart from that, I've only heard that Gabrielle Glaser, Don Colburn and Paige Parker will make up the new health team, after Dworkin's reassignment.

Sure would like to know more about it, doot-de-doo. *whistling*

Update: I finally got a copy of the reassignments. It's too much to go into in full but here are the highlights that I saw:

---The recently reprimanded Tom Hallman has been busted down to one of four city beat reporters under team leader Margaret Haberman. Just don't assign him any parking stories, Margaret.

--Helen Jung has been moved off the Nike beat to the Breaking/Daily Enterprise team. Brent Hunsberger moves to Nike.

--The entire Breaking/Daily Enterprise team is new in their positions.

--The new "Sustainability and Growth" team, headed by Len Reed, looks to have been assembled from the Northwest and various suburban Metro teams.

--Team most untouched: Investigations.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 07/17/2007 - 4:14pm.

Just point out that they employ a slacking, boot-licking group of editors and watch the defenses start rolling in.

Submitted by lestatdelc on Tue, 07/17/2007 - 6:13pm.

Anonymous Source wrote:
Just point out that they employ a slacking, boot-licking group of editors and watch the defenses start rolling in.

Would that be the gadfly-paper theory?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 07/17/2007 - 10:48pm.

Dylan Rivera go if Ryan Frank is moving in to cover real estate?

Submitted by LynnS on Wed, 07/18/2007 - 5:05pm.

...on the transpo beat.

yeah, I got the memo finally. :)

-----
Lynn Siprelle * Fairy Blogmother

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 07/17/2007 - 11:01pm.

I work there, and I can tell you that it's true:

One reporter got a new chair, with lumbar support.
Another got a new parking place, closer to the building.
One went to the supply cabinet and got a new notepad.

Forgive us if we aren't as inclined to linger over such matters as the TV crowd. Perhaps if we were better looking....

Submitted by LynnS on Wed, 07/18/2007 - 9:57am.

Because if you're telling me NONE of your compatriots care about being taken off longtime beats and put on others, you're nuts.

-----
Lynn Siprelle * Fairy Blogmother

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 07/18/2007 - 11:48am.

Pompous ain't the half of it. One change I've heard about: former crime team head Tom Maurer has been exiled to west bureau in Beaverton.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 07/18/2007 - 9:39am.

Why wouldn't you want people outside the paper to know who covers what? Doesn't that seem a bit counterintuitive?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 07/18/2007 - 9:41am.

but it does start to settle.

the new Growth and Sustainability [sic?] beat is coming together...Shelby Oppel Wood in a new position that combines reporting, web, multimedia, online presence. Pat O'Neill, formerly public health, now covering congestion of a traffic nature. Word is that arts/O! will stay much the same. Living should be the big change (again)...you have to wonder how long they are going to keep with the daily themes..."Pets" continues to be a stretch, although if they can bolster the online Living presence, pets videos are a sure-fire hit (just ask your TV friends).

There was Jonathan Nicholas' farewell column as he moves to the editorial writers group.

Other recent additions to the "Special to The Oregonian" list: Fred Leeson, and Sara Perry?

By the way, how about that newish Street/single copy edition? Very alarming. Big headlines. Bigger pictures.

Newspaper topics never do as well on this site as TV-related ones do.

Submitted by LynnS on Wed, 07/18/2007 - 10:00am.

It's primarily because TV people hang out here more than print people do, nothing more. My contacts are almost entirely TV and radio because that's where I worked in town--those are the people I know, and those are the people who give me info. Whenever print people give me info, I run it. If other print people don't respond to it, I don't really know what to do about that. I can only conclude they don't read it, and I can't make people read/participate. I give out all the print news I can find or am given. I only wish I had more time to research out more; I have very little.

-----
Lynn Siprelle * Fairy Blogmother

Submitted by Freelancer on Wed, 07/18/2007 - 10:10am.

The newspapers are doing the reporting so the TV "news" people can read it on air.

:)

Sorry, couldn't resist.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 07/18/2007 - 10:28am.

Suzanne Pardington moves from a suburban team to the higher ed beat.

Submitted by Warner on Wed, 07/18/2007 - 10:18am.

How they could keep Nicholas on the payroll, writing one column every two weeks or so. And seemed like 80% of them were about Cycle Oregon.

Did he have another job somewhere to support himself, or do they pay columnists that much? I'm not an "insider" so I'm naive on that issue.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 07/18/2007 - 2:31pm.

Jim Mayer is a wonderful reporter -- I always like his stuff....glad he'll be keeping an eye on City hall.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 07/18/2007 - 4:37pm.

Your latest post was about a Nicholas column that was published days before. Your observations about our work on youtube, flickr and OregonLive came long after the fact. If it seemed that you really were paying attention, maybe there would be more feedback from O. staffers like me.

Every time I peek in here, the discussion has nothing to do with the world I live in. That's doesn't bother me at all, but it's a little silly to complain that we aren't feeding stuff you can post. It just doesn't seem this blog is the place for serious discussion of print journalism.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 07/18/2007 - 4:56pm.

the TV folks are always on top of whatever PAC has to say

Submitted by LynnS on Wed, 07/18/2007 - 4:59pm.

I post about O stuff late because *that's when I hear about it.* If something happens in TV-land, I sometimes hear about it before the station's newsroom hears about it--because readers make sure I hear about it first. I have little trouble getting info about WW or the Merc, either.

I'm one woman. One woman homeschooling two kids and running another blog that pays the rent for this one. (OMI on average makes less than $1/day total revenue, which doesn't even cover its costs.) I completely rely on you readers to help me figure out what's going on in this town; I've never pretended otherwise. It's too much to cover without your help.

Should I just give up and let someone else do it? I could. But I doubt that person or persons would have much more luck monetizing it than I have, relegating it to hobby status at best. And most other folks with media connections are still too dependent on them to make a living to make running OMI a safe thing for them to do.

So you tell me, and I'm completely serious: What should I do, given my few (read: no) contacts at the O? I pay attention as much as I can. If there's some one-stop for info that I'm missing, tell me where it is.

If you want serious discussion of print here, you're going to have to help me make that happen. If you don't help me make that happen, well, you don't really want serious discussion of print here.

-----
Lynn Siprelle * Fairy Blogmother

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 07/18/2007 - 7:41pm.

If you haves it, shares it.

Submitted by LynnS on Wed, 07/18/2007 - 10:20pm.

That's alls I can say. :)

-----
Lynn Siprelle * Fairy Blogmother

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 07/18/2007 - 11:51pm.

Who is the new Public Editor?

Submitted by LynnS on Thu, 07/19/2007 - 9:51am.

At least, listed.

-----
Lynn Siprelle * Fairy Blogmother

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 07/19/2007 - 7:36am.

Where can we get a copy?

Submitted by LynnS on Thu, 07/19/2007 - 9:50am.

Here. It's not updated yet.

-----
Lynn Siprelle * Fairy Blogmother

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 07/19/2007 - 12:08pm.

If he's now "Special to the Oregonian," that sucks. He's one of their better ear-to-the-ground city reporters.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 07/21/2007 - 9:58am.

He retired.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 07/20/2007 - 5:53pm.

"The newspapers are doing the reporting so the TV "news" people can read it on air."

Okayokayokay, I'm one of those electronic copywriters who re-works O stuff. But here's the thing: Some days there ain't nothing there. Nothing. One day a couple weeks ago the front section was, like, eight pages long. Eight. Pages. Long. That's only two sheets of newsprint. What is up with that?

To me it seems like the O is becoming more like KBOO -- two institutions rarely grouped together -- because they have the same problem: they're profoundly irrelevant, despite a whole lotta heaving bosoms.....weird. And really really sad.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 07/20/2007 - 7:42pm.

Anonymous Source wrote:
"The newspapers are doing the reporting so the TV "news" people can read it on air."

Okayokayokay, I'm one of those electronic copywriters who re-works O stuff.

'I'm a vulture who's content to eat the stool of my evolutionary superiors, but there's not always enough protein in it to keep me alive. Shame on you! Shame on you all!'

Idiot....

Submitted by Spiro on Sat, 07/21/2007 - 9:36am.

Anonymous Source wrote:
Anonymous Source wrote:

'I'm a vulture who's content to eat the stool of my evolutionary superiors, but there's not always enough protein in it to keep me alive. Shame on you! Shame on you all!'

Idiot....

Ouch...a tellingly awkward analogy, likening one's work product to "stool."

The Oregonian isn't that bad; sometimes a little thin, as some have said, and much of the "reworking" of Oregonian copy that I've noticed in TV and radio is a rewriting of the same news releases and public-record government actions that some at the Oregonian seem to believe they, alone, know about.

Or it's a rewriting of AP copy--something the Oregonian itself uses heavily (like today's lead story in Sports about the crooked NBA ref), along with work by bigger newspapers and news services (like half of today's front page).

Same thing happens in markets like Omaha. This is not evolutionary superiority, although it's fair to say our fine local paper is an evolutionary predecessor.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 07/21/2007 - 10:07am.

The Oregonian is the major contributor to the AP in the state and maybe the region, and the use of its stories in other media is often predicated on that simple fact. A TV/radio writer pulling a story off the AP wire may not even realize that it's original to the Oregonian.

Submitted by Spiro on Sat, 07/21/2007 - 3:08pm.

Anonymous Source wrote:
A TV/radio writer pulling a story off the AP wire may not even realize that it's original to the Oregonian.

That's part of the worthlessness of AP. They'll run stories a full day after they show up in the Oregonian. There's no excuse for that, or for a TV or radio station running it, particularly when the story is often merely a followup to a news release or an event like Sam Adams' City Club speech Friday. The right thing to do is, if you run a story based on reporting by the Oregonian or other source, you attribute it--although my experience is that the courtesy is virtually never reciprocated.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 07/21/2007 - 2:00pm.

It's true the O gathers most of the news in Oregon, and it should, given it actually has a staff of gatherers. A long-ago KGW news director once admitted that the basic job of an ND in Portland was to rip stories out of the morning paper and hand them out to reporters. From my viewing, not much has changed in 25 years. except that maybe TV has fewer people to handle all those clips.
Back then the O relied on housewives -- some the equal of the fulltime folks -- radio reporters and other part-timers to gather, or at least tip the paper to, small town and downstate news, which then got to AP and around the state. That coverage was mostly dumped with a management decision to focus on the metro area the big advertisers, namely M&F, wanted to reach.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 07/22/2007 - 11:22am.

Anyone can read the Big O, only a handful of us can folo it up, like me. Or Lynn.

Years ago, a local businessman named Michael, who owns a very popular sandwich shop, was caught with a small marijuana grow-op in the attic of the store. Cops hauled him off to jail for a few minutes and Big O wrote it up.

Me, being a wide awake journalist at the KGW 8am story meeting, knew that dozens of hungry men and women would be lining up at Mike's for their favorite lunches, but would go away sad because he was still busy making bail.

I sent Jon Catton to do the "color" folo-up -- and guess who was outside a closed Mike's waiting for lunch? Tons of hungry people including cops, yes, even ol' Derrick F. was in line. They gave us the best quotes and were more than ready to forgive Mike, for one of his sandwiches.

Big O missed the folo, but gave us the idea.

There is copying and there is journalism.

Be a journalist. Please.

And if there is not enough news in Portland to fill an hour newscast, do a half-hour and run an old "Adam 12" instead. Your viewers will thank you.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 07/23/2007 - 7:06am.

12 has a huge file system of stories and raw tape (as do all of the other stations). Why don't they do more follow-up stories. A 'Where are they now' cold-case, kinda thing. It is amazing to me that they only pull out the occasional shots of people from the file when they get busted.

Submitted by LynnS on Mon, 07/23/2007 - 11:15am.

Anonymous Source wrote:
Anyone can read the Big O, only a handful of us can folo it up, like me. Or Lynn.

Did you actually work with me? Remind me of a time I did this right, because I usually beat myself up with my laziness. :)

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 07/23/2007 - 3:54pm.

Yes, Lynn, we worked together on a little show called "First At Four." You wrote with Tracy M. and Erin, making the producer, brought in from CNN and WUSA, look good. Very good.

You wrote some great lines, I may even have edited out a few, but I'll always remember Tracy's "First At Four" lead on the Milli Vanilli story.

"Milli Vanilli is... phony baloney."

Kathy Smith almost fell out of her chair after reading that one! Me too.

Signed,
S

Submitted by LynnS on Mon, 07/23/2007 - 5:30pm.

You were always my favorite producer. :)

-----
Lynn Siprelle * Fairy Blogmother
who still has her "first at four" mourning button

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Voting controls can be added to this post.
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
More information about formatting options