Late News Coverage of the M/SP Bridge Collapse

Submitted by pdxtvinsider on Wed, 08/01/2007 - 11:24pm.

Being a slow summer weeknight with little compelling local news, I was curious how the local news stations would handle the collapse of Interstate 35W in Minneapolis. The stretch of roadway, crosses the Mississippi River, and is a major thoroughfare between Minneapolis and St. Paul. Seven people were killed and scores injured as cars literally plunged 50 feet to the river below. The incident happened at 4:05pm pst which means 2/6/8 had almost seven hours to pull together some local coverage/reax/angles to this major national story that the cable news channels have been covering non-stop.

10P Fox: Not surprisingly, Fox 12 didn't lead with the bridge collapse story. Instead, poorly referenced surveillance video of a local robbery took top billing. When they finally did get to the collapse towards the end of the first block, they did it as a voice over into an investigative pkg fronted live on what local officials [ODOT] are looking at. If this is what Fox thinks 'investigative' journalism is all about, we're in trouble. The story starts out with people watching television coverage in a bar. Multiple meaningless local soundbites reacting to the tragedy including the ubiquitous, "I'm scared" bite from some woman who probably isn't scared about driving across bridges in Oregon but when pressed, said was she assumed the crew wanted to hear. Yeah, I'm scared too. This 'investigative' part of the story - and this is so sad - was nothing more than an ODOT spokesman saying there are lessons to be learned from the M/SP collapse. Really? Wow. Not one critical fact, not one revealing hint of real useful information. Here's a question: How often are Oregon bridges inspected - and how can the public find that information?

At 11pm, the coverage was mixed.
Channels 2/6/8 all led with the 35W accident but the hands-down winner for comprehensive coverage was KOIN. Channel 8 had typical ho hum coverage with a network pkg first and then some local reaction from a structural engineer. KGW made a strong connection about the importance of bridges in the Portland area [which is also true in M/SP].

KATU had what I'd consider the weakest coverage at 11pm. They stuck to an ODOT spokesman and got the company line about what they're doing. But even the Channel 2 report was more informative than Channel 12's 'investigative' report at 10pm.

KOIN went the furthest. Iwanaga on bridge inspection with an interview from an independent engineer from PSU who spoke on the concerns of bridge safety here in Oregon and then with Kohr Harlan with how emergency medical personnel would respond if something like that happened here. Perhaps a bit too much, but at least they figured out what the big story of the night was - and put resources into it. All in all, more on KOIN than their competitors tonight, but is anyone watching?

( topics: )
Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 08/01/2007 - 11:40pm.

Haha, them not leading with the bridge story was definitely NOT a surprise. Probably the only station in the country not to lead with it.

Submitted by pdxcess on Thu, 08/02/2007 - 12:56am.

I was surprised by 12's choice of line-up,too. Sure, it happened in Minneapolis, but Portland is the bridge city, so it's a relevant local lead. Hey, they could have just gone to the Sellwood,(As 6 did) to see a bridge that could fall down pretty easily under the right circumstances. As a viewer, I'm getting a little tired of FOX's preoccupation with petty crimes and even more petty criminals. Hey, I'm sorry the lady got robbed, but is that story really more important than a major bridge collapse? You'd think since the death toll is rising, that would fit right into their game plan.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 08/02/2007 - 6:15am.

KOIN was the only station to lead with the bridge collapse at 5pm, going with pictures provided live from the network and doing local commentary. It looked like the other stations didn't even know about the tragedy when they took to the air. Very strange. I'm NOT surprised that 12 didn't lead with it at 10pm. They couldn't. To the best of their knowlege there wasn't a pedophile with a Portland connection they could focus their "investigative team" on.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 08/02/2007 - 11:17am.

KGW's lead at 5 was the bridge collapse. Didn't have much in the way of pictures at the time. Looked like the helicopter for NBC was still trying to get to the scene when they took a live pic (Hello Minneapolis! What took you so long??) And they went back to it a couple of times during the show. Wasn't watching the others. I only generally watch one newscast at a time. It's enough.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 08/02/2007 - 3:03pm.

Wrong - KATU led with the bridge collapse at 5pm. Steve cut in with it at 4:45 as well.

Submitted by Tv_Viewer on Thu, 08/02/2007 - 9:59am.

I may be alone but I find myself watching KOIN a little more often lately. The only time I watch KPTV is at 10:30pm for Mark's weather forecast and then off it goes.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 08/02/2007 - 10:03am.

I only tune to the 12 now for Mark's segment.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 08/02/2007 - 10:46am.

I see I'm not the only one. I can't stand the rest of the 10pm news. I really wish Mark would end up somewhere else so I don't have to channel surf to see his weather segment.

Submitted by Myhousemf on Thu, 08/02/2007 - 10:28am.

I also am watching KOIN more. It really isn't that bad.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 08/02/2007 - 10:26am.

Seem to have a vendetta against channel 12. They got a whole package on and in less time than the other stations did. And in case you haven't noticed in all these years, 12 leads local! First Live Local! Hello! We've all heard it, now why don't you all get it? They don't do what the other stations do. And from what I remembered, 12 did report on the Sellwood Bridge. You just pick what you want out of what you see and spin it to what you want to see. You can never give 12 any credit for anything, and yet every other station is following 12's lead.

Submitted by pdxcess on Thu, 08/02/2007 - 11:15am.

I don't see it that way. I just thought that the story was big enough, and there was enough of a local tie-in to make it a natural lead. I think 12 gets plenty of credit for what they do. They produce good-looking newscasts, and they get ratings. But, I also believe that the daily dose of meth-head pedophiles and fear-mongering may have peaked. If you look at the other stations, they seem to be moving away from their copy-cat mode when it comes to FOX. As far as being the first to get a package on, who cares? Viewers are interested in the story, not whether it's a package, coverage from a sister station, or live video with local anchor voice-over.
Sorry you FOX people are so sensitive. But, sometimes the other outlets make the right call. In my opinion, last night was one of those times.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 08/02/2007 - 5:34pm.

Thats why you are the news director over at les schwab. Oh sorry, not anymore.

Submitted by Tv_Viewer on Thu, 08/02/2007 - 11:52am.

Anonymous Source wrote:
Seem to have a vendetta against channel 12. They got a whole package on and in less time than the other stations did. And in case you haven't noticed in all these years, 12 leads local! First Live Local! Hello! We've all heard it, now why don't you all get it? They don't do what the other stations do. And from what I remembered, 12 did report on the Sellwood Bridge. You just pick what you want out of what you see and spin it to what you want to see. You can never give 12 any credit for anything, and yet every other station is following 12's lead.

I'm giving you credit for a good weather forecaster who knows his stuff and usually gets it right.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 08/02/2007 - 12:21pm.

You guys over at KPTV can't handle criticism well.

Anyhow, I totally agree with pdxtvinsider's analysis and thought KPTV's decision to go with that pathetic lead-in really highlights their poor sense of judgement. I know they heavily focus on being LOCAL, but there are times when national stories CLEARLY trump isolated, cheap police blotter pieces. Reminds me of the night before Hurricane Katrina when 12 lead with a benign road rage incident. Sad, sad, sad, sad.

Kudos to KOIN...you guys did a pretty good job last night!

Submitted by LynnS on Thu, 08/02/2007 - 12:41pm.

I always watch the top 10 seconds of both 12 and 8-on-3 to see what the leads are and decide who I'm going to watch (I'm an inveterate 10 pm news watcher--the Daily's on at 11!). As soon as I saw that 12 was leading with some silly police blotter story I switched to 3 and kept it there for the A block. Tuned in to 12 in time to see their coverage of the bridge collapse. I understand the whole local thing but geez.

-----
Lynn Siprelle * Fairy Blogmother

Submitted by LynnS on Thu, 08/02/2007 - 10:51am.

The president could resign and 12 would lead local. It's their focus at 10.

-----
Lynn Siprelle * Fairy Blogmother

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 08/02/2007 - 12:05pm.

The question should be how much more are Oregonians willing to pay in taxes to improve the state's bridges. My guess? Nothing. But they will complain about traffic when work is being done.

Submitted by pdxtvwatcher on Thu, 08/02/2007 - 12:55pm.

Undoubtedly, the folks at FOX 12 will point to the 8.5 rating for last night's 10pm newscast (including a 9.4 in the 1st quarter-hour) and use the high number(s) to justify their decision.

Congrats on the 9.4 for your A-block. But know that there are a good many of us who believe that you could've had a HIGHER number (in the 10-12 range) if you'd developed the big story of the night appropriately off the top. But if the 9.4 is good enough for you, then so be it...

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 08/02/2007 - 1:44pm.

I can understand you criticizing our not leading with the bridge story. We always take the heat for those kinds of decisions from folks on this board. But when you say you "think" your way would have developed a 10 or 12 rating I have to laugh. You really should be a news director somewhere if you have instincts that good. As it was, last night's 10pm hour long newscast was THE highest rated program on any station (local, network, or cable) all day and all night long. Not just news program.. ANY program...beating Nightly News, So you think you can dance.. Jeopardy, Oprah so on. And with an 18 share for the entire hour that means 1 in every five homes was tuning in. Is that good enough for us? Never. But I bet it would be good enough for any of the other 3 stations in town.

You don't have to like what we do, as long as our viewers do that's just fine with us.

I don't agree by the way with your critique. For one thing, the bridge story was at the top of our Cold Open, then the top of the B-block. We had an anchor package.. not a vo.. then a package from a reporter, with another vo in between.

You also don't mention that KPTV was on the air before KOIN or KGW with live video of the bridge at 4:40, breaking into programming for 5 minutes or so.

Submitted by bigboy on Thu, 08/02/2007 - 10:08pm.

But ask 100 TV news people what the lead story should have been and (barring anything big happening locally), 99 will say it's the story that everyone in the country was talking about - the Minneapolis bridge.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 08/02/2007 - 10:33pm.

but the one guy/gal who says differently happens to have the most viewers. Go figure.

Submitted by Tv_Viewer on Thu, 08/02/2007 - 10:55pm.

Anonymous Source wrote:
...As it was, last night's 10pm hour long newscast was THE highest rated program on any station (local, network, or cable) all day and all night long. Not just news program.. ANY program...beating Nightly News, So you think you can dance.. Jeopardy, Oprah so on. And with an 18 share for the entire hour that means 1 in every five homes was tuning in....

Just curious what was the rating for tonight's broadcast?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 2:21am.

ratings are sometimes called "overnights" because the numbers are totaled overnight and aren't available to stations until the next day. So we won't know Thursday's ratings until Friday morning. And we won't know Friday's ratings until Monday morning.. when we'll also see Saturday's and Sunday's ratings.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 9:45am.

10pm
KPTV 8.8 20
KGW/CW .8 2

11pm
KPTV 4.7 13
KGW 4.4 12
KOIN 3.2 9
KATU 2.8 8

By my quick glane KPTV's 10pm was the 2nd highest rated show on Thursday behind NBC's Nightly News which got a 9.2 22.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 08/04/2007 - 4:30pm.

Rather than taking the harsh critical view, the clinical approach reveals a classic behavioral disorder; teleperversion, a repressed need for exhibitionism. The compulsion to broadcast these stories is a cry for help. Initially the news content begins with a gateway incident, a marijuana grow, which yields little visual interest or first person connection.

Subconsciously, however, the gratification of exposure begins. Invariably the siren of the methamphetamine subculture and its carnival of moral depravity will draw in the news content with easily obtainable gratuitous images. Once immersed, the news content begins to identify itself with the subject, the “bad newz funnel” effect. Visual pleasure is increasingly derived from nascent voyeurism, predatory point-of-view re-enactments, and dark comedic public humiliation. Time limits easily emancipate any guilt for not providing any actual useful information. All visually compelling facets of human tragedy can be tidily bundled, and the addiction to meth addiction is complete.

What can we do to aid broadcasters who fall victim to teleperversion to recalibrate their moral compass? Stop giving them attention

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 08/02/2007 - 6:05pm.

Nice try Cory!

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 2:17am.

Rod.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 08/02/2007 - 6:47pm.

Don't buy it. Local news stations need to lead with the biggest story of the day, local or not. Call me old school, but I think that is what viewers expect from ANY newscast.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 08/02/2007 - 7:36pm.

"As it was, last night's 10pm hour long newscast was THE highest rated program on any station (local, network, or cable) all day and all night long."

What does that have to do with smart insightful journalism? Exactly. Cutting in to breaking news in the afternoon: So what? What I find deficient in your thinking is ratings trump content. You think because you had higher numbers you did a better job covering the story? Stop kidding yourselves. When push came to shove, Koin kicked your butt in the late evening with better LOCAL coverage of the bridge story. You were out-thought and out-covered. Your 'investigative' pkg was 70% mos and an official soundbite ODOT. It was laughable.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 9:35am.

At least 12 had a LOCAL pkg about it. Maybe it wasn't to your exact taste, but it wasn't just a national pkg thrown on. Now I didn't see the intro to it, I will give you if they used investigative, that made no sense. But just because David Wilson works on a story doesn't always make it a FOX 12 Investigators story.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 10:23am.

Sure you may have done a local package but can you at least put some effort into it? The "investigative" piece didn't provide anything that we viewers didn't already know...and it doesn't hurt to inject some substance once in a while you know? It seriously looked like it was put together in 10 minutes. But alas, I know it may be difficult for you guys to cover a story that doesn't have a peeping tom, child rapist, or meth lab involved somehow.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 9:41am.

is that KPTV produces its newscasts for the viewers. We sit on here and rip each other about how we as "journalists" think we should be covering stories. It's an interesting debate really. Do we know better what the public should be seeing on our air? Or is the viewer smart enough to know what they want?
Let's face it, ratings right now, is the best gauge we have for discovering whether they choices we make in our story meetings are really the choices our viewers agree with. Sure there are other factors like lead ins and anchors and things like that.

However, I think the average viewer couldn't care less what a station's lead was. We put far too emphasis on "leads." I know exactly why KPTV played that story in their second segment... because they don't take CW as a serious threat and knew people would stick around for 10 minutes to see the story, which then boosts their average a tad. I think the bridge story should have been their lead, but I'm a journalist like you.

But in KPTV's defense and regarding your post, I wouldn't necessarily use the term "smart insightful journalism" with any of the broadcast media outlets in this town... including 'butt kicking' KOIN. Stations around here once in a while do something noteworthy, but by and large not so much. I think the people doing the best journalism in Portland are the Portland Tribune and the Willamette Week. But that's just me.

Submitted by pdxtvwatcher on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 9:29pm.

I agree with you.

KPTV is the marijuana dealer of TV news. They know there is a buyer (the audience) for their drug, so they supply it and consider themselves smart for figuring out how to be on the lucrative side of the supply and demand curve. Let the buyer's "health" (the viewers' education about "real" news) be damned. After all, money-making is the only goal. KPTV has it figured out. (But unlike the real pot dealers, KPTV does it legally :)

I have long applauded KPTV for their smart business decisions. And I'm OK with their (news) business model -- but only if they openly admit their motive. Sometimes they do; most of the time they don't. If they'd openly and proudly tout: "Hey, we've figured out how to win, and that matters much more than doing what is journalistically responsible". But they don't say that. Instead, they use their high ratings as an indicator of their superior journalistic judgment. In their mind, as long as the nightly ratings show that they're #1, they're making the right content decisions. The problem with that belief is that ratings and content have long been independent of each other -- because there are so many other overwhelming factors that influence & determine the nightly ratings. Yet the KPTV folks routinely argue that it's their CONTENT decisions that make them #1. I call bullshit. Loudly.

KPTV is #1 because:

1) they've created a buzz in the market,
2) they're on at 10pm in a market where the audience continues to show signs of going to bed earlier and earlier,
3) they've got great anchors,
4) their presentations style (graphics & pace) is fantastic,
5) they've got a great main weather guy, and
6) they've got some hot FOX lead-in shows.

All of the above factors absolutely dwarf the importance of newscast content -- especially since all 4 stations in town often report on the same set of local crime stories (which is an argument pro-KPTV posters routinely make here when defending against attacks upon their content).

I maintain that KPTV is a success DESPITE their content -- not because of it.

OK, have at me. But know this: there's no way to prove me right or wrong. It all comes down to opinion and judgment -- nothing more.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 9:47pm.

Is a pretty darn good analysis. KPTV runs one of the most successful news operations in America. They are consistent, they know their mission, and like what they do or not, viewers know exactly what they're going to get. And they win even bigger when other stations in the market try to copy them (in certain ways.) I would hope that KPTV one day would get more serious about news. Heck, keep doing the crime if you have to, to attract viewers, but then give me something I really should know. A good 2 or 3 minute piece on a topic no one else will touch that really effects me. That's my hope. KPTV has had a great sense of tapping into what's popular and truly I believe if they can sell the more in depth pieces to their viewers it may someday happen. I hope.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 08/04/2007 - 10:53pm.

Use to watch but the sloppy dressed anchors (low budget) and the arrogance that comes across the screen got annoying.

Went back to our old days of KATU
Plus A.M. Northwest has come back now that they have Dave Anderson to bring humour to the start of the day.

The shock meth watch/pervert crime alerts on 12 wore thin.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 5:14pm.

"I think what the poster was saying is that KPTV produces its newscasts for the viewers..."
I pity the viewers. Really.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Voting controls can be added to this post.
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
More information about formatting options