Monday: Katu at 430pm

Submitted by pdxtvinsider on Mon, 08/06/2007 - 4:51pm.

Just for kicks, I watched Katu's 4:30pm newscast for a quick round-up of the top stories and weather. Wow. First question: Does this show have a producer, or is it an bastard step-child of the 5? Confusing lead-ins, non-sensical stacking, unreferenced video, atrocious writing and stories that don't make sense; it looks like an under-staffed and resourced newscast that barely gets on the air.

A Steve Dunn newsroom tease was so poorly written I wanted to change the channel in frustration. Here's an opportunity to drive viewers to promotable stories in the 5pm newscast and they're working hard to send viewers to the competition. All told, this is one troubled show - and a revealing look at the other problems plaguing Katu's on-air product.

( topics: )
Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 08/07/2007 - 11:23am.

Katu's has slid dramatically in quality since Tamerlano came on board. He likes to hire inexperienced people like the new news director. The 4:30 is just another example of the slippery downhill slide KATU has been on for the last year. Crap is King finds a new TV champion.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 08/07/2007 - 6:37pm.

How is Don Pratt inexperienced? Manager in San Fran, News Director in S.C., Asst. News Director in Boston. Are you kidding me? You people are so ridiculous. You probably work right next to him and kiss his ass all day and then rush home to post on OMI. Pathetic. What other "inexperienced" people has Tamerlano hired? Name a few.

Submitted by rocky on Tue, 08/07/2007 - 2:03pm.

KATU has only news at 4:30 But at 5 they all are mediocre.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 08/07/2007 - 7:08pm.

I'm sick of news teases "coming up at 5, 6, 6:30, 10, 11" all of the stations do it and if its as important as you'd like us to think, why can't we know now?
Special damnation for teases involving an outcome, be it a sporting event, council vote or a search. If you know something and act like you don't know "did the Blazers win?" What searchers found, are taxes going up? You are in essence lying to your viewers. Am I alone on this?

Submitted by Tv_Viewer on Tue, 08/07/2007 - 9:37pm.

Anonymous Source wrote:
I'm sick of news teases "coming up at 5, 6, 6:30, 10, 11" all of the stations do it and if its as important as you'd like us to think, why can't we know now?
Special damnation for teases involving an outcome, be it a sporting event, council vote or a search. If you know something and act like you don't know "did the Blazers win?" What searchers found, are taxes going up? You are in essence lying to your viewers. Am I alone on this?

Nope and in my opinion all of the stations could do with cutting some of the newscasts. By the time the 6:00 or 6:30pm news comes on they have been saying the same things for the last hour.

Submitted by FIRECRACKER427 on Wed, 08/08/2007 - 8:28am.

I agree!! I am tired of KPTV's 10 o'clock news - it is just a big advertisement and tease for the 11 o'clock news. I watch the 10 o'clock news because I can't stay up til 11. So I made the switch to Kgw's 10'clock news..

Submitted by shifty on Wed, 08/08/2007 - 9:07am.

While we're at it, let's get the used car salesmen to just tell us their best price up front!

Seriously, at this point in the industry this behavior is practically hardwired into our DNA. Producers and promo people train with consultants to do it better (aka, more obnoxiously). No one even sees it as phenomenally ironic, to be a news organization that is refusing to report news.

So, no. Put that on the growing list of ways local news continues to blast away at its own feet.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 08/07/2007 - 9:11pm.

Well how about this garbage wrapped in skin?

8/7/07 in his 6:30 pkg:

"...a rape gone wrong".

Well Thom, please give me the circumstances when a rape goes right. I see the oversight of the frat boy reporter is top notch over on Sandy. Go drink some more Coors Light Thom

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 08/08/2007 - 7:53am.

Anonymous Source wrote:
Well how about this garbage wrapped in skin?

8/7/07 in his 6:30 pkg:

"...a rape gone wrong".

Well Thom, please give me the circumstances when a rape goes right.

Um, when the victim is a licensed CCW holder and shoots/stops the attacker dead in his tracks?

Submitted by Tv_Viewer on Wed, 08/08/2007 - 11:40am.

Anonymous Source wrote:
Well how about this garbage wrapped in skin?

8/7/07 in his 6:30 pkg:

"...a rape gone wrong".

Well Thom, please give me the circumstances when a rape goes right. I see the oversight of the frat boy reporter is top notch over on Sandy. Go drink some more Coors Light Thom

I can't really even begin to defend this but what story was he talking about?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 08/09/2007 - 4:06pm.

It's bad enough to breathlessly read from the coroner's report during the dinner hour, but Thom's backward baseball cap must have been squeezing his brain too tightly when he let that one fly.

It was in an edited pkg mind you, so it's doubtful that he was the only one to ok it. Perhaps his frat boy, roofie slipping, misogynistic, subhuman buddies work in the newsroom.

Seriously, when you can't self edit a horrible comment like that perhaps it's time to reevaluate your life and your career. Thom are you so desensitized to violence that this is acceptable to you? Is a 15 year old girl's life not worth respect or dignity. Perhaps she brought all this on herself?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 08/10/2007 - 4:02pm.

To all who jumped in the fray and posted comments about KATU's Thom Jensen:

Thank goodness you're all out there! You, the few the fearless, the FLAWLESS, really. I didn't think your types existed in this glorious industry we so proudly lable "the media"...or in the world for that matter. I'm talking about you, the piss, vinegar and venom-filled sideline quarterbacks who, from the tone of your self-righteous blog responses, one could gather have NEVER, EVER made mistakes or "slip-ups" of any variety. Be they in a live shot tag, in one of the thousands of VOs you've written for a newscast you've AP'd, on the obituary page, on your audio board, from behind the lense of your P2 camera, or wherever you currently remain miserably holed-up. Never mind everyone from Charles Gibson to "Susie Reporter" at her first job in Bangor, Maine has a story to tell about when he or she "let something fly" on the air that was totally inappropriate--on accident! We all now know YOU never would, and, boy are we relieved!

The fact you point out is ture, Jensen made one of those unfortunate mistakes that hit the airwaves. It can't be taken back because it's out there. It was a verbal mis-step for which he's probably been reprimanded harshly by his superiors, fiercely criticized in viewer e-mails and likely endlessly kicked himself.

But while you, oh-so-mighty ones are blogging your brains out on this and other industry thread slam-fests, Jensen is out there spanking you and the rest of the competition on a weekly basis...something he did in particular with his Dani Countryman murder investigation stories. But you and the rest of the media-types who reported ONLY what Strovink dished out on the case probably already know that, and you were ready to pounce on ANYTHING just to do something but stand there with your fingers up your noses.

And, as you're out there trying to dream up ways to out-wit one another with "frat boy" repartee, he's probably coming up with yet another exclusive investigation or asking the questions you're too chicken sh*& to ask. While you and your media outfit are kissing the backsides of some PIO just to get a soundbite to package regarding the news release that's "hot off the fax," Jensen is probably digging up the exclusive angle you'll be scrambling to jam in your follow-up piece three days from now whe you realize you got your booties kicked.

In closing this rant, I'd like to offer up some words of advice: until you can pony up proof of your perfection, until your list of accomplishments reads like Edward R. Murrow's, or at the very least, until you bring one tenth of what Jensen has to this DMA since he's been here...get off this guy and all the other HUMANS out there you and the other blog-junkie vultures trash on DAILY because you're avoiding the heavy lifting guys like Jensen are doing for you!

And P.S., Had y'all done one speck of research--asked his friends and colleagues at KATU (like any GOOD reporter would) before posting you would have known he's not a Coors Lite guy...we're in Portland afterall, and you know what they say...when in Portland do as the Portlanders do...gotta reach for the microbrew. Cheers!

Submitted by Tv_Viewer on Fri, 08/10/2007 - 7:05pm.

Some observations I would like to offer

1. You are responsible for what you say on the air. I don't care if it live or in an edited package.

2. No one is perfect and humans make mistakes but you are still responsible for what you say on the air.

3. Thom Jensen is a good reporter and did a good job with the story. But I'll say it again just in case you didn't catch the first time: you are responsible for what you say on the air.

4. Did Thom or anyone else at KATU apologize for what was said?

I don't work in the industry and would have been offended no matter who said that.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 08/13/2007 - 10:44pm.

In addition to the stupid, reckless and insensitve characterization of the crime, this incident highlights a complete and total breakdown in the editorial controls at KATU.
Nobody caught it, now KATU cheerleaders are angry not at what was said, but because it is now an issue, and the newsroom does not/will not/can not acknowledge its responsibility.
It would feel pretty bad to kick ass on the story for a week straight and top it off with what is probably (hopefully) the most insensitive and stupid remark this reporter will ever make.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 08/10/2007 - 5:41pm.

I usually do not even respond to these gutless, bathroom wall blatherngs. But, you are correct I made a mistake under deadline pressure when I wrote "...rape gone wrong." I cringed when I heard it on the air.

I apologize to anyone who I might have offended. Surely you (gutless one) have made a mistake before. Thank God this is the biggest thing you have on me. I can think of a few other mistakes I've made that were much more severe.

But this rant sounds like someone who is jealous about getting his ass kicked on the story for a week straight.

Have the balls to write your name when you start name calling. Don't be a gutless wonder.

I do, however apreciate the "frat boy" refernce. I didn't know I looked so young. It's been 20 ears since I've been in a fraternity (Phi Alpha SAE brothers).

By the way, I only drink Oregon wines and micro-brews-- not Coors Light. Please send any donations to 2153 NE Sandy Blvd.

-Thom Jensen (not afraid to sign my name)

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 08/11/2007 - 9:16pm.

You cringed when you heard it on air through your ifb, which means it wasn't live was it.

It was in an edited pkg.
You thought it.
You wrote it.
You tracked it.
Perhaps it was reviewed by someone else.
It was edited in probably by someone else.

Butch up Thom. Your "frat boy" MENTALITY, certainly not age, shone through like Deb Knapp's fake tan. You had plenty of time, even under deadline pressure, to realize it was a huge mistake. Deadline pressure by the way, that every reporter feels every day without making grotesque comments like that.

Clearly (brainless one) I have made mistakes before. You are not putting me on the defensive to avoid the heat you deserve. All the ass kicking in the world flew out the window when that comment left your lips...into a mic, then on tape.

Here's some free advice: Shut up already!

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 08/12/2007 - 12:51pm.

Perhaps a sign of the times or the difference between Katu and other television newsrooms that still get it right: quality control. I can't imagine a script with that verbiage getting on the air at most medium/major market television stations - unless there's absolutely no quality control. No EP, no Assistant News Director/Managing Editor, News Director? Not one producer with a head on his/her shoulders who could take a moment and read it for style, sense and clarity?

Katu staff and their apologists - go ahead and attack those who notice, care and call you on the carpet for it. If this blog wasn't around it would be one more mistake swept under the rug and forgotten over some 'micro brews' at the dive down the street. Katu used to be one of the better stations in town - now it's bottom-dollar bottom-feeder like Koin - barely getting it on the air - and obviously not even doing that well. Katu and the Spirit of the Northwest? Not my Northwest.

Submitted by Zamboni on Sun, 08/12/2007 - 10:17pm.

KATU used to have a great system for reviewing copy before it got on the air. People there used to talk on the street about working with a managing editor who help them made their stories better.

Now, it seems, the only edits are time edits (Producer: "I told you it has to be 1:15!").

Everyone - and I mean EVERYONE - needs to have their scripts reviewed for clarity and content. Just "banging it out" isn't good enough.

Submitted by pdxcess on Mon, 08/13/2007 - 2:02am.

Who hasn't made a mistake that they wish they could take back? The difference here is that most of those kind of mistakes are live. The anchor or reporter on a live shot says something, and then realizes "Oh, I shouldn't have said that!" Usually, they hear about it once they get off the air, either from management or a viewer who takes offense. But in an edited package? That shouldn't happen. There should be at least two sets of eyes on every script. Someone should have caught that rape comment before it made air. Deadline pressure or not, everyone has at least a couple of minutes to give a script a last once over before it's tracked. That being said, Thom did do a very good job of covering that story, other than that unfortunate comment.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 08/13/2007 - 2:14pm.

Obviously there is a lack of oversight in the Katu newsroom. So instead of bitching about it - fix it and have done with it. It's happened once; it will happen again. The notion that there aren't enough people to insure quality control over the content of a newscast is bs. Figure out a system where every on-air piece of copy gets reviewed - and the name/time/approval is recorded for follow-up.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 01/08/2008 - 4:38pm.

Thom...way to hold your ground, I have watched you in San Diego on 10 news and you are an amazing reporter with integrity. Dont listen to these backwoods hillbillies, please come back to San Diego.
Later Frat Boy....shootin gootin gootin!!!!!

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 08/08/2007 - 3:37am.

Thom Jensen and the KATU gang are journalists like Michael Jackson is a cage fighter.

I caught that, offensive doesn't begin to describe it, comment from Mr. Jensen. Take him off the air immediately. This makes Don Imus' comment pale into insignificance.

Hey Thom, a hiker lost in the woods is, "...a day hike gone wrong".
A drowning victim is, "...a fishing trip gone wrong".

A dead rape victim is NOT "...a rape gone wrong".

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 08/10/2007 - 9:02pm.

I did not take offense with Thom's statement but took it like I believed he meant it to be taken. Many women in this country are raped - which is a horrible, violent attack upon them - but are not murdered during the crime. I believe that is what he was trying to impress upon us. During the commission of this violation of Dani, the suspects went overboard - for whatever reason/s, a "rape gone wrong" and killed her.

Submitted by Tv_Viewer on Fri, 08/10/2007 - 10:18pm.

Anonymous Source wrote:
I did not take offense with Thom's statement but took it like I believed he meant it to be taken. Many women in this country are raped - which is a horrible, violent attack upon them - but are not murdered during the crime. I believe that is what he was trying to impress upon us. During the commission of this violation of Dani, the suspects went overboard - for whatever reason/s, a "rape gone wrong" and killed her.

Okay. I can buy that but did he actually say that and I stand by what I said before: you are responsible for what you say on the air.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 08/08/2007 - 9:52am.

Experienced or not, he's unpredictable and unprofessional. His word is worthless and he's more worried about "being liked" by (some) of the producers than being a leader. KATU is the other side of the KOIN in lame news.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 09/13/2007 - 11:05pm.

Pratt couldn't give a shit less about being liked! Unpredictable and unprofessional - maybe - but the last thing he's doing is kissing employees asses. They're the ones kissing his ass... so he doesn't go hire a buddy from his old market(s) and give away their job!

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 08/08/2007 - 5:28pm.

This KATU, Pratt and Jenson bashing is immature and petty.

Morale is on the rise at KATU because we have a plan. We're succeeding, in fact. Sure, it's slow, but it's happening and the majority of us are not as disgruntled as the few angry posters on this blog.

If you're so unhappy, please leave. Quit watching. Or improve your own crappy product.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 08/09/2007 - 8:46am.

You are right, KATU's crappy product is at least equal to the other stations' crappy products. It's good to hear you finally have a plan. How long has it been in the making, and has it been deployed yet? And it's good, too, to hear that you are not "as disgruntled" as the few posters on the board. I am eagerly awaiting this revolution in local news to which you allude.

Submitted by PNWMEDIA on Thu, 08/09/2007 - 10:50am.

Wow KATU's ex weatherman is now an anchor at CNN.

They lost another intern today to some other place.

Adult son saw Dave Anderson up a Chinook Winds at the Comedy Club so we have switched back some months ago to KATU.

The folks there have always seemed more humble and family friendly.

Fox12 staff come across as "all that and a bag of chips" so we tired of that psuedeo hip cool mode.

Anyone know how the Boz is doing these days?

I think Rhonda Shelby is a veteran around KATU.

The more posters put down KATU the more we wil support them as viewers.

One poster talked about how old/annoying the Fox12 meth head of the day was getting I concur.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 08/09/2007 - 1:49pm.

Rob's been gone for years and I haven't heard "all that and a bag of chips" since Happy Days went off the air. Now get up, walk over to your black and white Tee Vee and turn that dial to another channel. You probably only have 3 to choose from, right?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 08/09/2007 - 3:34pm.

Nice response, wisenheimer, but you didn't read the note. What the poster is saying is that instead of just doing weather for CNN, Rob is now anchoring ala Ted Baxter, one of the people who sits behind the desk and yaks. He actually did a pretty good job last week. Weird watching him though...

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 08/09/2007 - 7:39pm.

It was weird to watch him do weather when he was at KATU. At lest he lost the sideburns!!

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 08/09/2007 - 8:09pm.

It's only been months since he started anchoring at CNN.. You're only painfully out of touch.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 08/12/2007 - 6:54pm.

KATU's plan seems to be chasing the scanner. There's little to no enterprise reporting. The new news director doesn't have a plan. If there was a plan the daily news content wouldn't be made up of crap off the wire and scanner stories. Most of the Northwest's viewers aren't seeing anything much worth watching.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 08/13/2007 - 2:00am.

Chasing the scanner is what he's learned in other markets. WHDH in Boston is a big breaking news station. But it's also the 6th largest market in the country; so there's always some news to chase. Here in market 24 it's a little slower.So unless the daily bank robbery, drug shooting or strong arm robbery do much for you, you're out of luck for serious news on Channel 2.

KGW and KPTV continue to gain viewers at the expense of Koin and Katu. KGW is the content station; 12 is the spot news station. Viewers are figuring it out and realizing that 2/6 - though reliable in the past - are no longer welcome in their homes. Advertisers are figuring it out too.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 08/13/2007 - 4:41pm.

It is becoming increasingly obvious that the only reason John Tamerlano has a job as GM of KATU is because of his relationship with Fisher's President and CEO, Collen Brownn. In his 20 months at the helm, our 5pm news now generates less than a 3 household rating, and our sales revenue places us in 5th place in the market. His changes and big plans have certainly strengthened our station!!

As a sales department, we are struggling to sell and deliver minimum 2 demo ratings for adults 25-54. Only the 6:30 and 11pm newscasts deliver these market minimums. We are getting killed on buys with these dismal ratings, while the self-named JT has his big smile, and sprints from meeting to meeting like a rat on speed. When he's not doing that, he is composing who knows what on his office drafting table like he is some type of creative genius.

And now he has been promoted to VP of Sales for Fisher Broadcasting. He can't even effectively run the station, and his buddy Colleen Brown gives him more responsibility, and I am sure, a lot more money.

When will the insanity stop?????????!!!!!!!!!!

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 08/14/2007 - 8:36am.

Good observation and very true. Tamerlano is anything but a visionary and the 'big plan' to turn KATU around with a relatively inexperienced news director and tight financial restrictions is having little - if any - positive effect.

Here's the problem: the product isn't what viewers want and the station has failed to make the necessary changes. KATU has continued to see ratings decline over the past three years but hasn't taken any significant action to stem the tide. They haven't re-worked their look/image, content, on air talent or promotion. The internal changes staff see as 'significant' are not perceptible to viewers. For most local viewers, nothing at 2 has changed for the better. And here's an important note: Though morale is slightly up in the newsroom - good morale is not enough to stem the ratings tide. There have to be definitive and distinct changes made and those changes in coverage and tone - promoted to the viewers.

I have issues with the anchor team - who are come across as strangely detached and removed from the product. I've never seen the appeal of Deb Knapp and Natalie seems just strange. Steve Dunn 'looks the part' but his delivery to me is shifty and difficult to watch. The one anchor they did have with some personality and local roots, Cathy Marshall, was unceremoniously shown the door.

The effort to focus on breaking news is not enough to entice viewers - especially when it so obviously comes at the expense of developing solid content. Again, the constant push for insignificant crime news research has shown viewers do not care about. And the viewers who do care about it are going to go to 12 to get it. Why don't the folks on Sandy get this? They've missed the window to brand themselves the crime/breaking news station. That franchise is taken. [And no, I don't work for 12 - and don't respect their product either.]

As for 'JT' - a perfect description of the guy. HIs day will come.

Submitted by Anonymous Source on Tue, 09/04/2007 - 2:18pm.

Someone here a while back predicted talent changes on some of their low rated newscasts. Anyone over on Sandy Blvd know if this is still going to happen.. Who and when?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 09/04/2007 - 5:27pm.

The only person who would care about the answer to your question would be someone jockeying for one of the positions or looking for a promotion. Weekend anchor upgrade? reporter upgrade?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 08/29/2007 - 4:15pm.

What happened to Scott? It seemed liked he had just started and then he was gone.
That must have been the quickest hire/exit ever! I thought he delivered the sports well.

Confused in Portland

Submitted by Tv_Viewer on Wed, 08/29/2007 - 9:01pm.

Anonymous Source wrote:
What happened to Scott? It seemed liked he had just started and then he was gone.
That must have been the quickest hire/exit ever! I thought he delivered the sports well.

Confused in Portland

From what I remember, he was just a temporary hire till they hired the permanent weekend guy. In my humble opinion they should have kept him instead of hiring the new guy.

Submitted by Myhousemf on Tue, 09/04/2007 - 1:49pm.

Scott is at KATU now.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Voting controls can be added to this post.
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
More information about formatting options