Did anyone see the call for submissions in the Sunday Oregonian? They're looking for about a dozen people to contribute the occasional piece on a variety of topics. It's unpaid. It sounded a bit like OPB's new Public Insight Network.
The O's call for commentatorsSubmitted by JimL on Mon, 09/24/2007 - 1:46pm.
Did anyone see the call for submissions in the Sunday Oregonian? They're looking for about a dozen people to contribute the occasional piece on a variety of topics. It's unpaid. It sounded a bit like OPB's new Public Insight Network. ( topics: Oregonian )
If one isn't being paid, why in the world would one want to submit to the O's terrible editing? Sorry, if they want to dumb down my vocabulary and decouple the logical links in my material, they'll have to pay me. If one isn't being paid, why in the world would one want to submit to the O's terrible editing? Sorry, if they want to dumb down my vocabulary and decouple the logical links in my material, they'll have to pay me.
...because what editor could improve upon "decouple the logical links in my material"? Boy, The Boregonian has alot of nerve asking for free submissions. Boy, The Boregonian has alot of nerve asking for free submissions.
They are owned by one of the wealthiest publishing empires (Newhouse)in the world and unfortunately, remain a virtual monopoly in Oregon. The dough continues to poor in, but obviously the seeds of corporate greed have been planted. ANY writing that is solicited and published should include some sort of payment to the author. I would imagine that the paper is looking at all options to try and save money- except, of course, perhaps cutting the exhorbidant salaries of senior management. And here's a nutty idea- why not publish a few thousand less copies of the throwaway Foodday by not distributing this rag on a weekly basis to thousands who don't want it? The cost of newsprint alone would save alot of money! Oh no- as usual, why not begin with those who make the least money. Let's pay nothing for submissions so Mr. Senior Manager can have the newest Lexus to impress the neighbors. Well, based on that, I wouldn't hire you to write anything - even on a bet! Good luck Viewer Rick Maybe they need to save money, so that they can afford to throw more unwanted "fooddays" in our driveways! It is great if you want it, but just try to get it stopped! Yep, the Food Day in the paper that you "subscribe" to is one thing, but throwing it everyone else's driveway is ludicrous. Thinking of rounding up a couple of weeks from our neighbor's houses and dumping back up on the Oregonian's doorstep. Two can play at this game. I was really distressed that whether they should put an asterisk on Barry Bonds Record homer warranted the full upper page in END OF THE WORLD font, but a supreme court ruling against the PATRIOT Act was below the fold and in barely readable font. I guess I didn't realize that sports memorabilia was more important than rights. Oh well. Good thing I don't pay for the Oregonian. Just a reader/viewer. Nowhere in my statement did I say that I do not read the Oregonian. In fact, I think it't pretty evident from my post that I do read it, I just don't pay for it, which is precisely what I said. I do find it funny that there is no justification as to why a baseball is more important than real news? You're griping about the placement of news stories in a newspaper that you read but don't pay for? Even though the important story that interested you was on the front page? we both know that story selection is subjective. You could make your argument about almost any front page or newscast on almost any day. For finally addressing the futility of your arguement. First you attack me personally. Now you're calling it subjective. (It WAS on the front page) Thank you also for missing my original question, which was, (I don't mind repeating myself.) Why did the story about the asterisk warranted "end of the world" sized font? Also, why did it have to take up the entire above-the-fold section. Oh, Right, Selling papers. Nevermind. Maybe you saw the early edition of the paper, which uses screamer headlines and leads with talker stories. But you are correct. It's all about selling newspapers and there's nothing wrong with that. And there's nothing wrong with the "asterisk" story leading the front page. Newspapers are businesses. The make money selling advertising and, to a much smaller degree, selling newspapers. Sell more newspapers, ad rates go up. The newspaper makes more money. It's capitalism. You want a personal attack? OK, here you go: You're a peevish cheapskate. let's pause and refresh: Post new comment |
blogadsOur Other Sites |
Posting GuidelinesYou don't need to get an account, but anonymous posts are screened and user posts are not. Random comments go in Open Threads. User loginBrowse archivesOMI Gear![]() OMI gear at Cafepress! Here's the latest sale:
Recent blog posts
Recent comments
Who's onlineThere are currently 1 user and 286 guests online.
Online users
blognetnewssponsors |
I did notice this but was pretty pooped after yesterday's festival. I was initially intrigued, but then decided if I were going to write for free I'd rather it be here. ;)
-----
Lynn Siprelle * Fairy Blogmother