Why I Like Steph Stricklen

Submitted by LynnS on Mon, 03/24/2008 - 9:36am.

She's a moosh.

Yeah, it's not "professional" to have a strong reaction to a story on-air (aka a "meltdown"). I'm sure she wishes she hadn't burst into tears after reading into a sound clip of a Missouri firefighter who ended up rescuing his own wife from the flood waters--only to have her die in his arms. But one of the things I've always liked about Steph is that she's very genuine; her reactions to stories are real, and she doesn't over-edit and over-distance herself. Anyone else, I'd wonder about sincerity, but I never do with Steph.

[promoted from comments.]

( topics: )
Submitted by Zamboni on Mon, 03/24/2008 - 9:57am.

Peter Jennings. Walter Cronkite.
Steph is in good company.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 03/28/2008 - 1:39pm.

---So I cant tell you if I like her or dislike her; I can only speak to her anchoring.
She's solid for morning, light material---but never belongs on an evening newscast.
That said, her show of emotion ,while endearing to many, is also unprofessional. Personally I don't understand why it is so wonderful for people to see other people "lose it" emotionally. Why does it make you feel better to see that she has sadness inside of her when witnessing the news story that moved her??

Perhaps I'm a bit presuming, and have too much faith in people, but I choose to think everybody is "human" unless they show another side. That would suggest that the default perception of others for anyone who enjoys seeing someone "act human", is that others are inhuman or sub-human to begin with.

Suffice to say, when one's job is to deliver information---just do it. Let me-- the viewer-- decide if its "amazing", or "gut-wrenching", or "unbelievable" .

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 08/15/2008 - 6:00am.

Next we will hear that Steph is the new "Murrow" and will be reporting from the Blitz on London.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 03/24/2008 - 12:31pm.

She is way over the top in the drama catagory.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 03/29/2008 - 10:49pm.

In the bigger picture.. this emotional anchor thread is really a debate over traditional versus today. Many younger anchors believe they are an important part of the broadcast. They are not simply delivering the news. They think it's important, even necessary, to insert themselves into stories. They think viewers want to hear more about the anchor, their feelings, opinions, etc. The more traditional anchor keeps that kind of stuff to a bare minimum. The star of the show is "the news" -- not the person reading it. I'm not arguing a right or wrong approach here but there are definitely both types of anchors on the air here in Portland.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 08/15/2008 - 2:21pm.

"They think it's important, even necessary, to insert themselves into stories. They think viewers want to hear more about the anchor, their feelings, opinions, etc."

The operative word in the above comment is THINK. They THINK...apparently not very much.
Viewers don't care what an Anchor thinks, especially at the small town local news level. You want to show emotion, go do the Oprah Show.

Secondly, if you do a critical voice analysis using sophisticated Synthonia Audio Spectrum Analyzer software, wherein one can follow spectral centroid, power curve, key estimation, tonal change detection, harmonic spectrogram, and a large number of low-level spectral features, you will instantly understand the unrealistic nature of the anchor woman's tears. In other words, she was faking it, an old trick taught at many acting schools.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 03/24/2008 - 12:57pm.

...a few more genuine people on the local (and network) news staffs.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 03/27/2008 - 9:36pm.

1. Most of us in news ARE genuine human beings (perhaps contrary to popular belief) and many stories touch all of us. Steph's not that super special.
2. We are not children, we are adults delivering the news and we should do so as such. Steph should have read the copy first. She was obviously not prepared.

Regardless of how "nice" she is, she is a professional in this business. It is not that she shouldn't be human--rather, praise those anchors who are forced to hold in their emotions even when they feel them--just as much as Steph.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 08/17/2008 - 2:23pm.

Stricklen is not one of those genuine people.

Submitted by Eltear on Mon, 03/24/2008 - 12:59pm.

and humane. I agree that Steph's sincerity shines through -- no crocodile tears here, just heartfelt emotion shared by her audience.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 03/24/2008 - 1:25pm.

This business is tough on anyone with a heart. It's understandable to have an emotional reaction sometimes.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 03/24/2008 - 1:39pm.

I don't object to her show of emotion here. I do find it maddening, however, that she injects herself into every story she reads! Her thoughts, her opinions, how she personally typed in the search term. It's all so insignificant, but she doesn't fail to tell you about it. None of it matters. So very unprofessional.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 03/25/2008 - 10:15pm.

Great post. I agree 100%!

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 08/15/2008 - 2:23pm.

Great Agreement. I agree another 100%

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 08/16/2008 - 10:18am.

The agreement has been reached.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 08/17/2008 - 4:49pm.

She may or may not be great, but injecting oneself is unhealthy.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 03/26/2008 - 5:26pm.

I worked with her since the day she started and I'm really trying but I don't recall her injecting her thoughts or opinions into every story she reads. If you're that worked up about it, maybe you should spend less time focusing on that and switch the channel?! It's just an idea.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 08/15/2008 - 2:25pm.

I disagree with your disagreement to the agreement above.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 08/16/2008 - 5:31am.

I am in total agreement with your disagreement over the other person's disagreement.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 08/16/2008 - 10:00am.

I cannot fathom your agreement with the original disagreement over someone else's disagreement. Consequently, I must disagree with your agreement.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 08/17/2008 - 5:37am.

the constant agreements and disagreements are beginning to cause a disagreeable reaction.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 08/17/2008 - 2:21pm.

good to see the readers challenging instead of simply agreeing. Don't you agree?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 08/18/2008 - 5:10am.

The divinity is a disagreeable topic and has no business in the discussion at hand.

Submitted by SeattleTVGuy on Mon, 03/24/2008 - 3:22pm.

I was in the NWCN control room getting ready with Nick for his live weather hit (seen at the end of the video clip), and it took us a moment to figure out what was going on. Part of us was saying wondering what was going to happen next, but afterward, we were also in agreement with everyone here-- you've got to be human.

Thanks Steph, for reminding us to be sincere and human!

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 03/24/2008 - 3:59pm.

I wasn't sure what to expect before seeing the clip. This is completely understandable, she just had to take a moment to compose herself. There have certainly been worse breakdowns in TV history. As she said, every so often something just gets to you. It's not like she was trying to emote on behalf of the viewer, like certain cable news personalities do ... .

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 03/24/2008 - 4:02pm.

She's a true talent. KGW is VERY lucky to have her.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 03/24/2008 - 4:09pm.

I mean, I watched the clip and it just looked like a normal reaction to a pretty intense, and sad, situation. Props to her, too, for apparently not minding that KGW posted it. When I read the comment here that it was a "meltdown," I expected something far worse. This was actually kind of nice display of humanity in a robotic field.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 03/24/2008 - 7:27pm.

Watch her take that new vacant weekend night spot....?

Submitted by Myhousemf on Fri, 03/28/2008 - 6:29pm.

Anonymous Source wrote:
Watch her take that new vacant weekend night spot....?

Possibly, she was anchoring with Amy Troy tonight.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 03/28/2008 - 10:07pm.

As a fellow KGW employee she has made no secret of her disdain for weekends. I gather the following: some people love her, some people don't, some people strike me as jealous, some people strike me as genuinely turned off by her, some people think she'll go as far as she wants -- here comes network! All the anchor discussions are the same: Tracy, Joe, Laural, Steve, Jeff, Steph. Blah blah boring.

What I find facinating about this is how much people are talking about her. I made a post and checked back and there were 10 new ones. Between her kleenex "prop" and her "cue the tears now" to her rabid fans who think she's genuine to those who suspect she's not ... she's getting more mileage out of this than Hillary Clinton.

I believe what she wrote in her blog. I don't have a problem with it. But I'll be interested to see where she is in 10 years. Or 5. My guess is she won't be filling in anymore. What do I know. I just work there.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 08/15/2008 - 2:28pm.

"As a fellow KGW employee she has made no secret of her disdain for weekends."

It seems odd that someone could disdain weekends. I've always enjoyed them myself.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 03/24/2008 - 8:19pm.

We should never forget that the news is really about us [journalists] and our reaction to it. It's one thing to show some emotion; but blogging about, posting the video and sermonizing over it goes way beyond objectivity. Move on Steph...

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 03/26/2008 - 8:36am.

And that is Steph. You've got her pegged. If you know her you know she is all about herself and the stories should be about her. Move on yourself, Anon 8:19.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 03/24/2008 - 9:32pm.

For those who have never talked to her, she's a great person both on and off camera. I've never met Steph in person, but we often exchange emails about health stories, ideas, and occasionally other things. It's always interesting and often funny to find out what she thinks of what I have to say (especially when it comes to my experiences as a health care provider and a patient).

As I told Steph when I saw the video clip, she showed on Friday morning that she doesn't just report the news, she also cares about what's happening too.

Submitted by Tv_Viewer on Mon, 03/24/2008 - 10:12pm.

I didn't see it and when I watched the video I didn't see anything wrong with her reaction. It is good to know that she is a human being. As far as I concerned she has nothing to apologize for.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 03/25/2008 - 8:40am.

I think it is refreshing to see people in our industry touched by the stories we report. I am a producer, and after more than ten years in the business I sometimes still feel that lump in my throat when I read wires about "microwave baby", "missing boy found dead"... the list goes on and repopulates everyday. I don't know Steph, but her reaction shows she is a caring human.

The thing that bothers me is this: "Steph reacts to death". It is the title of the video link to that story.

So...is the story now about Steph and her reaction. Are we supposed to be more moved by that, than by the firefighter whose wife died in his arms? Whomever decided to link her reaction with that title is making the story about the anchor.

Also curious, re: producing? I was wondering what I would do. I suppose I'd go straight to the weather hit....it must have been pretty intense in the booth for you.

Submitted by Bill Cooper on Tue, 03/25/2008 - 9:40am.

I've already told Steph this, but I think it bears repeating here. There is never a need to apologize for being human and letting your emotions show when you present the news. During my 37 years in broadcasting there have been countless times something has hit me particularly hard and my emotions were right there on public display. For me it was always the stories involving violent crimes against kids - especially if they died - that got me. The fact that you let your human side show is a good thing. I think I would have had to pause after this story as well. Frankly, I get a little worried about reporters and anchors who never show any emotion or don't seem to have any feeling at all about the stories they cover. Stephanie is one of the best reporters and anchors in Portland. This business is lucky to have her.

-----
"Those who dance are often thought insane by those who cannot hear the music" -- George Carlin

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 03/25/2008 - 9:52am.

Interesting that the story following the flood story was about a woman who was killed violently and freakishly in full view of her family. Not exactly the kind of story you want to recover with.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 03/25/2008 - 4:49pm.

People in the media deal with tragic situations every day. Could you imagine if anchors broke down every time they read a horriific story ? The entire newscast would turn into "Terms of Endearment". Steph might be a great gal, and her reaction might have been "very human", but crying on the job shouldn't turn her into Mother Teresa. Also, doesn't she ready her copy before a newscast ? Wasn't she aware something horrible was coming ? Just wondering.

Submitted by shifty on Tue, 03/25/2008 - 8:06pm.

Anonymous Source wrote:
Could you imagine if anchors broke down every time they read a horriific story ?

Maybe they'd think twice before reporting every emotionally-driven, sensational tragedy and spend a little time reporting actual, boring news.

Submitted by pagani on Wed, 03/26/2008 - 8:01am.

Three cheers for shifty!! :)

--------------
C. L. Pagani

www.OregonPainter.tv

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 03/26/2008 - 3:16pm.

Next thing you know you'll all will have her Sainted. If she is as good as her OMI fan club thinks she is, then how come she is stuck in Portland and just a fill in news(crier)reader? Next thing you know instructions will appear on anchor scripts - Eyes should tear up here/Cam2/-Toss to weather. Give me a break, she knew the story was coming.

Submitted by catnw on Wed, 03/26/2008 - 2:23pm.

I have always enjoyed Steph. I missed the incident discussed here, but it does not change my opinion of her. I am glad she is in the Portland market. I like her humanity. And, as opposed to someone above, she is professional enough for me, especially compared to the stiffs in toupees or sporting face lifts in LA.

This morning, I chuckled watching her and Amy Troy standing next to each other. The height difference was wonderful to behold.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 03/26/2008 - 7:29pm.

I have to wonder, as I was watching the clip - there was a long pause as the second story started. Why didn't the Director pull her off and have someone else (like the anchor) read the rest of her section?

Stephanie is a human - if she were this emotional every day, I'd say it's very unprofessional. Once in a blue moon, it'll happen to the best. But it seemed to just drag on, and on...it was time to give her a break and let someone else get the job done. No offense to her, but she was clearly overcome with her emotion.

Submitted by Myhousemf on Thu, 03/27/2008 - 4:35pm.

She was the only anchor there at the time. She had to continue it herself.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 03/27/2008 - 12:27pm.

She is way to Sally Rallyish... And interjects to many personal comments...

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 03/27/2008 - 2:21pm.

We got your point after the first post.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 03/27/2008 - 3:14pm.

Steph is a professional possibly the best at KGW. I have worked in much bigger news markets than Portland and I will tell you she can and does run with the best. She could pick anywhere she wanted to work in this business and be very sucessfull. Since when is it not OK to be a human and not have emotions. If you work in this business long enough something is going to bother you sooner or later it has nothing to do with being a professional. Steph is very good at what she does and all of us that work with her everyday know it. Watch out NBC here she comes!!

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 03/28/2008 - 9:58am.

Just about every on air person I know gets emotional over certain stories. The difference is they read over the stories before they go on the air and process their emotions at their desks rather than on live television. I've cried over stories at my desk too many times to count. But then I get on set and do my job the way I'm supposed to. I agree that anchors should not be robots, and I don't have a big problem with what happened to Steph because we've all felt it at some point in our careers. But I have a problem with all of these people acting as though she is some kind of hero because she lost it on air. And to me the most exploitative thing about it is the way KGW put it on thier website and titled it "Steph reacts to death." Are you kidding me? That's disgusting.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 03/28/2008 - 11:28am.

I like Steph a lot but the only thing that bothered me is the fact that KGW decided to actually feature it on their site with that title; very exploitive indeed! Quite sickening.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 03/28/2008 - 8:39am.

She has a passion for her job... and occasionally if that transcends into a show of emotion I completely understand. Quite Frankly why would you want it the other way... there are a lot of robotic anchors out there -- you can have 'em.
I work with Stricklo every morning... she's the real deal.

Submitted by Spiro on Fri, 03/28/2008 - 11:35am.

You know, thanks for posting that. I was thinking along the same lines and didn't feel like getting flamed today. I know it irritates the hell out of conventionalists, but Stephanie definitely has an "it" factor. She punches through the television screen and yet the content, and the process of television journalism, remain the star. There might be some edges to sand down, but I agree. Stephanie can go where she wants to go.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 03/28/2008 - 1:47pm.

I was ok with it right up until she started waiving that kleenez around like a prop. to show people she truely was crying and that "whoa is me" I need to take an "oprah" moment.

Where the hell did that kleenez come from so quick anyway? Prop?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 03/28/2008 - 8:41pm.

Why didn't the producer just go to the wx guy during that eternal silence? Way too slow of a reaction.

Submitted by SeattleTVGuy on Sat, 03/29/2008 - 2:42am.

Technical reasons. The control room in Seattle can only hear KGW's air, but not their intercom/IFB. Nick hears both, but because the control room doesn't, it's a little more difficult to pull off last second changes like that.

And, since Nick is in Seattle, it really requires a toss.

Submitted by Captain Sarcasm (not verified) on Sun, 03/30/2008 - 10:12pm.

Yeah, I hate it when newscasters do that whole sincerity stuff. That's so unprofessional.

I wanted to see an interview with the firefighter where the genius reporter asks him:

"So, you wife died. How does that make you feel?"

Submitted by bigboy on Mon, 03/31/2008 - 5:28pm.

...goes to Captain Sarcasm.

Submitted by Tony (not verified) on Thu, 04/03/2008 - 2:12pm.

Many years ago, alone on a Saturday afternoon in the production room at KWJJ, back when we were still in the Wilcox mansion, I was trying to produce a promo for the Oregon Food Bank that talked of hungry children. Couldn't do it. Kept getting choked up every time I got to that line. I didn't have to worry about anybody judging me, though, or putting it on the Internet or making fun of me for caring, and I got as many takes as I needed to get it done.

Always kinda wondered if it wouldn't have sounded more sincere to leave the feelings in...

Sometimes things hit right where you feel.

Steph, you're top-shelf talent. Lovin' ya!

Submitted by Myhousemf on Mon, 04/07/2008 - 10:02pm.

Margie Boulé has an article on it.

Submitted by LynnS on Tue, 04/08/2008 - 11:15am.

Forgot to mention it.

-----
Lynn Siprelle * Fairy Blogmother

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 08/14/2008 - 1:58pm.

Does anyone else think Steph Stricklen needs to work on her appearance? I understand she is in a different country, but I don't understand why she is consistantly only half put together. The other "KGW reporters" Joe and Laurel throw to seem to have found time to put on a pressed shirt, make-up, and brush their hair. It just looks unprofessional. I wonder what kind of impression it gives off to her peers in China. I think it makes Portland look like a second tier news market.

Submitted by Myhousemf on Thu, 08/14/2008 - 5:13pm.

It's only because she isn't in HD like Joe and Laurel are.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 08/14/2008 - 5:33pm.

If anything, HD makes people look worse, not better.
I agree about Steph. She does a great job but needs some serious help getting her "look" together. Can't they hire a consultant?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 08/14/2008 - 5:44pm.

second tier market.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 08/15/2008 - 12:26pm.

She always looks like she just jumped out of some liaison de la boudoir and barely made it on time for the feed.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 08/14/2008 - 9:12pm.

Stephanie's casual appearance doesn't seem off to me. It's the Olympics not a political convention or news conference.
It's also terribly hot and humid there. She probably feels like melting!
I really enjoy her reports. She's so friendly and down to earth. Someone who could easily be your friend.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 08/15/2008 - 9:01am.

True she isn't at a news conference, but compare appearance last night to the woman KGW contracted for the 6:30. Steph looked like she just got finished with a work-out. The contracted reporter looked like....well, a reporter. It's about professionalism.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 08/15/2008 - 2:09pm.

"...but compare appearance last night to the woman KGW contracted ...The contracted reporter looked like....well, a reporter. It's about professionalism."

Yes, the PNW accepted dress code of frumpy scruff isn't perhaps the best when one is looking for credibility...even if it is only sports.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 08/15/2008 - 5:39pm.

The contract reporter was probably working for several stations and figures this is her time to look smoking hot and get a new job. The former she did well.

Steph does a great job always, and she looks like a portland girl in bejing. She isnt looking to hang with brian williams.

But the headband needs to go.

Who is the photog she is working with?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 08/15/2008 - 6:50pm.

Just saw this so called " pro " give a live report... she was awful.... what a joke she is.....

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 08/15/2008 - 9:51pm.

"She's so friendly and down to earth. Someone who could easily be your friend."

Nothing personal. I just don't need a friend on my television.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 08/15/2008 - 10:02pm.

"I choose to think everybody is "human" unless they show another side."

The above is a quote from an anonymous commenter to this ongoing melodrama re: Stricklen.

We all think she is human until she demonstrates otherwise.

Submitted by Karly (not verified) on Sun, 08/24/2008 - 6:46pm.

I just watched Steph's wrap up report on KGW's evening news show and it and she were great.
Getting a hug from Kobe.....WOOT!
Loved your reports Steph, headband and all. :)

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 08/25/2008 - 10:32am.

Are you kidding me? Great to see her get a hug from Kobe? A reporter's job is to be objective. Her final piece was self promoting and embarrassing. Did you see Bob Costas hugging Marion Jones in 04? He didn't. That allowed him more credibility when he had to report on the steroids she used.
Steph is a jounalist, she is not the story. If she wants to befriend the subjects of her stories--great, but keep it off TV. Personally I think Kobe is a rapist. I am not impressed with her friendship or closeness with him or any of the athletes she hugged. It shows poor judgment of her to shoot that piece and even worse judgment of KGW to show it.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Voting controls can be added to this post.
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
More information about formatting options