KEZI and OSN Part Company

Submitted by LynnS on Sat, 08/02/2008 - 12:12am.

KEZI and the Oregon Sports Network have split:

The decision is the first local fallout from the UO’s recently signed deal with IMG Communications. IMG agreed to pay the UO $67.1 million over 10 years for advertising, promotion and local broadcast rights for UO sports. KEZI’s decision leaves the university without a local broadcaster just a month before its first football game of the season.

Eugene-based Chambers Communications, KEZI’s parent company, issued a statement Thursday saying the deal offered by IMG left it little choice but to walk away from the contract. ...

Tim Roberts, IMG’s Eugene-based representative, said Chambers’ decision to drop out of negotiations was a surprise. He said talks were centered on how to handle competing programming, when Chambers pulled out Thursday. ...

In an interview Thursday, Scott Chambers said his company paid about $1 million a year for rights to UO sports programming before the UO brought in IMG. Chambers said his company earned a modest profit selling advertising on the shows. Without naming a figure, he said the new deal with IMG would have been a loss for his company.

Wow. I thought OSN was the primary local draw for the station. I continue to hear all kinds of rumblings from down there. What's going on?

( topics: )
Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 08/02/2008 - 8:07pm.

Scott Chambers did not pay even close to $1 million a year for the contract. Try a quarter of that.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 08/03/2008 - 9:58am.

That's what Chambers said to the Register Guard...

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 08/02/2008 - 11:16pm.

Rumblings about KEZI cutting ties with UO have been going ever since the UO went behind Scott's back to take Giansante from under their nose. THEN KEZI refused to buy space at the Olympic Trials, choosing instead to broadcast from 3 blocks away with no presence during the city's biggest event in... oh, ever?

The hilarity of it all is how obsessed their ND is about UO sports. He has been nown to drop every story, regardless of its prominence in the community, in favor of duck announcements or games. Even if it comes down to "so and so bent over in front of the Chambers family today."

Man, I hope UO kicks ass with this one and goes to KGW or someone up north. KVAL isn't nearly as strong as it used to be, but they could snag a deal on this one.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 08/02/2008 - 11:57pm.

Geeze using the loss of the football contract as an excuse to bash KEZI is lame (to be polite). Nobody wants to say that the UO/IMG contract is more about UO greed than anything else.

No instead we have to talk about how bad the anchors are, spread rumors about Burris switching to the weekend (she is going to have a kid so it is a move that makes sense if you think about it which most do not)

How exactly does the 11 PM news team have anything to do with the loss of the OSN? Answer nothing just another lame attack on the station.

I don't like the news broadcasts either but that is not the subject matter of this thread. Unless Burris or Brandy Smith were directly responsible for KEZI losing the contract stay on subject.

As for the subject they are talking about 1-2 football games and then the basketball season at the most. The only ones who might try for the contact would be Comcast since they can afford the loss leader a Duck contract would be.

Kezi is going to wind up with just about the same number of Duck football games because of the ABC/Pac-10 contract anyway.

So how long will it take for this thread to wind up as a trashing thread of all Eugene stations?

Submitted by Hunter Thompson on Sun, 08/03/2008 - 6:32am.

Here Here! KEZI and Mr. Chambers understand the math better than do most readers of this site.

IMG paid U of O 67-million over 10-years. That means they must recoup 6.7-million annually to mythically "break even."

KEZI claims to have paid 1-million in years past. Dubious, but accept it for the sake of argument.

That figure requires KEZI to recoup only slightly more than 1-million to be profitable.

Now that IMG is in the mix, the annual nut moves up to 6.7-million, a considerable hurdle for a small market station like KEZI...even if the station likely would not have hd to cover all of the 6.7 million, but perhaps a third of that.

Given the state of the economy and the fact that the Eugene car dealers can't give away a truck or SUV, the math doesn't work. KEZI will get any and all ABC games anyway, so Chambers' math was correct.

Submitted by Noah Webster (not verified) on Sun, 08/03/2008 - 11:17am.

Hunter Thompson wrote:
Here Here!

I'm absolutely sure the real Hunter Thompson would have known the phrase is correctly "Hear, hear!"

Submitted by Hunter Thompson on Sun, 08/03/2008 - 3:51pm.

The real Hunter Thompson is, unfortunately a victim of his own hand and was blasted into sub-earth parabola by Johnny Depp. We'll never know whch way he would have preferred it.

Submitted by rifleman69 on Mon, 08/04/2008 - 10:38am.

Yep, Chambers didn't think $6.7 million (or whatever the number was, it obviously had to be at least a double if not triple increase) was worth it. Eugene, Medford, and Bend aren't that big in terms of paying that kind of money. I'm betting Comcast will spend the money to pick them up, and then wonder why they're not making anywhere near a profit from the Blazers and Ducks.

Submitted by Beckham on Sun, 08/03/2008 - 10:16pm.

It's not just one or two football games... We're talking about almost all the games. Regardless of whether or not ABC has it, OSN always records and re-broadcasts the games. That means replays, also content for KDRV in Medford and KOHD in Bend. Last year, Chambers played 8 or 10 baskeball games for their three stations, and the football games were almost every single week. If the football team does well, ABC will pick up there games... but, not to get on a sports conversation...but... we'll see. This contract is a big deal when you consider three markets will no longer be airing Oregon Ducks games, the state's arguably first or second most payed attention to team.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 08/04/2008 - 2:09pm.

you mean Bland-y Smith

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 08/03/2008 - 8:27am.

My guess is that for IMG to control all aspects of Duck marketing, it felt it had to edge out the remaining media players. One way to do that is to offer up deals that folks like Chambers had no choice but to refuse. It sucks, but IMG simply is not going to mess around with locals when you have $60 million on the line.

KEZI may still have the majority of the games via ABC, but it doesn't sound like they will be able to do any of the pre, post or coaches shows which were pretty good. I wonder how/if IMG will step up and produce that number of programs.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 08/03/2008 - 9:43am.

Sounds like KEZI management has begun to chime in trying to deflect any of their indiscretions and twist everything to their liking. They certainly don't like it when anything comes up that they want to keep quiet. It's not KEZI bashing, its just airing their dirty laundry they don't want anyone to know about.
Whether it be the reason why they lost the OSN contract or why they demoted a well liked and talented evening anchor, Burris, for no reason, they don't want people talking about it. Management knows what they're doing is wrong and they don't care. They don't value their employees or the connections they have with community organizations. The community and viewers are more aware of this now and distancing themselves from the station. A good example, losing OSN after 10 years.
And yes, how many anchors have they cycled thru in the past couple of years? Too many to count. And who are they to decide what schedule is best for a pregnant woman, isn't that her decision?

Submitted by Beckham on Sat, 08/16/2008 - 10:55am.

What someone should be saying, if we're on the lines of:

Quote:
And yes, how many anchors have they cycled thru in the past couple of years? Too many to count. And who are they to decide what schedule is best for a pregnant woman, isn't that her decision?

What company is legally allowed to make decisions based on pregnancy? Should this even be a question we're asking? Pretty sure there's not a single company in the US that could make those decisions. Doesn't equal opportunity still exist......?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 08/17/2008 - 5:42am.

Pregnancy is as good as any other yardstick for employment. After all, if a person gets pregnant, hasn't that person demonstrably proven that they think their personal life is far more important than a broadcasting position? Any responsible News Director has to view a pregnancy in the Newsroom as a direct threat to the ratings and to his/her job which is based entirely on ratings which flow from continuity which flows from staffers who want to be on the job instead of having children - not that that's a bad thing.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 08/17/2008 - 4:53pm.

What a jerk. If men could get pregnant, abortion would have been legal 1000 years ago. Burris may or may not have chosen to get pregnant. God knows we have all failed at protection from time to time. That said, if she chose to shift to weekends, that's her decision and you sexist pigs should butt out!

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 08/04/2008 - 10:34am.

Anonymous Source wrote:
Sounds like KEZI management has begun to chime in trying to deflect any of their indiscretions and twist everything to their liking. They certainly don't like it when anything comes up that they want to keep quiet. It's not KEZI bashing, its just airing their dirty laundry they don't want anyone to know about.

Wow I got a promotion AND a job at KEZI at the same time. I wish someone would have told me that.

The thread was about losing the OSN, it was not yet another lame attempt for people to trash KEZI's decisions regarding the news department.

I get it people dislike Kezi but in this age of modern technology there is an easy way to deal with it.

TURN THE CHANNEL IF YOU DISLIKE THE STATION.

Nobody forces anyone to watch them so if you dislike them don't watch them. What a novel concept.

Quote:
Whether it be the reason why they lost the OSN contract or why they demoted a well liked and talented evening anchor, Burris, for no reason, they don't want people talking about it. Management knows what they're doing is wrong and they don't care. They don't value their employees or the connections they have with community organizations. The community and viewers are more aware of this now and distancing themselves from the station. A good example, losing OSN after 10 years. [/quote}

Did you ever consider that due to Burris due to having a baby this month that lessening how much time she worked might have been her idea not the stations?

Ever consider that because of her current condition that it would be too much for Burris to work a full schedule?

No of course not it is more fun to simply think that KEZI wants to torture you by not informing you about their newscaster news.

Oh and calling Burris talented is a good laugh, she is a younger Shelly Kurtz always bumbling her lines.

Losing OSN has to do with UO greed, not Burris or Brandi Smith or Kim Stark leaving the station.

It has to do with a company paying 67 million dollars and wanting to recoup their investment. No Eugene station really can afford to pay those kinds of dollars.

Get real please

Quote:

And yes, how many anchors have they cycled thru in the past couple of years? Too many to count. And who are they to decide what schedule is best for a pregnant woman, isn't that her decision?

So according to you there is a direct line from the decision to drop OSN by KEZI to who is on the anchor desk?

You know something maybe you should start a petition, gather some friends and protest outside of the Chambers building. You can even invite KVAL and KMTR to cover it.

And while you are at it you should demand a criminal investigation into how Burris was demoted.

Or better yet turn the light bulb on and consider that perhaps Burris might have wanted a lighter workload due to her condition.

Take a dollar and please go buy some clues there is no linkage from not being stupid enough to overpay for something and why Burris is working on the weekends.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 08/04/2008 - 8:06pm.

There is no direct line between what is going on with the newsroom and the connection with Chambers losing OSN. That's not the point. It all just goes to show the entire station and company is going down the tubes.
Too bad you got a job and a promotion there all at the same time. Let's see how loyal you are to the station when they screw you over as they have so many of their employees. You already sound quite bitter.

And as for her 'condition' as you call it (didn't know having a baby was considered a 'condition'), it's quite doubtful Korenza Burris would choose to take a demotion right before her maternity leave. Management most likely didn't want to hold her evening position for her to come back to, so they demoted her before her leave. The station should be investigated over that.
Burris and Kim Stark are so much better than their replacements. As someone else stated, Blandy Smith. Her and the old man are simply painful to watch.
So, yes, I have tuned in to another station.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 08/03/2008 - 5:19pm.

What happened to Kim Stark?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 08/05/2008 - 12:18am.

Kim Stark has her own Myspace page http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendI...

So why not ask to be added and ask her yourselves as to why she left instead of playing clueless gossips.

Better yet all these posts crying about poor poor Korenza being demoted to the weekend fails to consider even the possibility that due to her being due to deliver in the next couple of weeks that SHE HERSELF just might have wanted to cut back on her work load.

Why no that could not be possible because that just might make some sense that a person who is about to become a parent might just want the extra time to (a) get prepared for the birth of her first child or (b) cut back on the workload so she could also cut out some of the stress of being in the spotlight.

Got to admit I got a huge laugh when the clueless ones fixated on their anti-chambers obsession that it does not dawn on them that turning the channel takes money of their pockets. It makes KEZI less profitable and if the station starts draining money that maybe they just might sell the station to another out of area company like KVAL and KMTR are owned by.

No not one of the Anti-Chambers whiners says word one about the Ducks looking to screw their fans by signing with IMG. Nah that same team that makes people pay twice for the same football tickets are a bunch of great guys.

That same bunch of wonderful fellas wants to build a white elephant of a basketball arena not caring about who it might affect, not caring about the price tag or heck just not caring about anyone but their athletic department.

No instead it is all about the evil folks at Chambers communication.

Some people would not realize this even if given free clues because they are so blinded by their hate

Submitted by Dorothy Parker (not verified) on Tue, 08/05/2008 - 12:19am.

I've said it before and I'll say it again- an interest in SPORTS is a stupid and trivial pastime. I suppose those with juvenile personalites, or.. shall we say- undersized equipment- need this dreary hobby. And that's just the women- don't get me started on men!!

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 08/05/2008 - 7:43pm.

Indeed, blogging on OMI is a much more mature hobby. Do you have any Grey Poupon?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 08/05/2008 - 5:20am.

"Oh and calling Burris talented is a good laugh, she is a younger Shelly Kurtz always bumbling her lines."

ha! and agreed. Kurtz is sooo bad. I cannot understand why Fisher keeps her on, even in the morning.

Burris seems like a very nice person but never has projected a personality/charm/charisma to be weekday anchor. And as a producer/anchor for late news her decisions were never the brightest. Back when Al Franken broadcasted his live radio show from LCC it was Burris' stumbling which eliminated coverage of the event from the 11pm news (although it was covered on the 5pm and 6pm newscasts).

Not defending Chambers decision how Burris was demoted (if that is what it ends up being, a permanent change) but KEZI needs a new anchor team...badly.

Now with OSN gone, Rick Dancer gone (good anchor, good person, lousy politician), virtually no local programming by KEZI, and the legacy of Peter Jennings replaced by the new Disney at the ABC news, and since you can now download ABC network programming via internet if that suits your fancy, there is absolutely no reason to continue watching KEZI. Yes vote with your channel selector and with your voice.

Maybe the coaches show and game replays will be brought back to OPB? ;-)

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 08/06/2008 - 3:38pm.

Here's how I see it, as a person who is actually there to see it.

1: None of the newsroom activities have anything to do with OSN. So quit asking "what's going on over there?" You stupid twits.

2: Kim Stark was ...[redacted] a sub-par anchor. Just cause you've been there for a few years doesn't mean you are good. The station was smart to let her go.

3: Korenza Burris is a virus in that newsroom. Constantly complaining and whining about how unfairly she is treated (this pre-dates her demotion.) How the managers are idiots. How much it sucks there. Gee, wouldn't you demote someone in that situation too? Or should she be rewarded for such actions.

I knew this thread would emerge after the OSN-IMG, Chambers deal split. And I knew it would turn into another KEZI bash session. I also knew it would, again, be filled with tons of misinformation, just as the NBC Bill thread was.

Frankly, at this point, I'm glad these threads go so far south on this useless OMI site. It shows how much lack of credibility this site has. How full of crap it all is. Particularly on all the Eugene threads.

All these negative KEZI comments are nothing more than a small handful of disgruntled employees and former employees, sounding off. And to all of you I speak of: either get a new job, or get over the fact that your old job didn't want you anymore. Your egos are pathetic. Get over it, and move on, and leave the rest of us in peace. Weaklings. I'd be happy to list you by name, because I know who you are. But if I did that, I also know, Lynn wouldn't approve the comment, and all this typing would be a waste of my time, which it practically already is anyway.

Submitted by Bland (not verified) on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 12:22pm.

Anonymous Source wrote:
Here's how I see it, as a person who is actually there to see it.

1: None of the newsroom activities have anything to do with OSN. So quit asking "what's going on over there?" You stupid twits.

2: Kim Stark was ...[redacted] a sub-par anchor. Just cause you've been there for a few years doesn't mean you are good. The station was smart to let her go.

3: Korenza Burris is a virus in that newsroom. Constantly complaining and whining about how unfairly she is treated (this pre-dates her demotion.) How the managers are idiots. How much it sucks there. Gee, wouldn't you demote someone in that situation too? Or should she be rewarded for such actions.

I knew this thread would emerge after the OSN-IMG, Chambers deal split. And I knew it would turn into another KEZI bash session. I also knew it would, again, be filled with tons of misinformation, just as the NBC Bill thread was.

Frankly, at this point, I'm glad these threads go so far south on this useless OMI site. It shows how much lack of credibility this site has. How full of crap it all is. Particularly on all the Eugene threads.

All these negative KEZI comments are nothing more than a small handful of disgruntled employees and former employees, sounding off. And to all of you I speak of: either get a new job, or get over the fact that your old job didn't want you anymore. Your egos are pathetic. Get over it, and move on, and leave the rest of us in peace. Weaklings. I'd be happy to list you by name, because I know who you are. But if I did that, I also know, Lynn wouldn't approve the comment, and all this typing would be a waste of my time, which it practically already is anyway.

:Applause:

Wow, that was a good lashing. You really taught everyone here a valuable lesson about the quality of this website. Thanks mom. Too bad it comes from the one person in the newsroom that obsesses over "gossip" sites more than anyone else in the history of being. It's like Carrot Top lecturing a person for having red hair, or Santa Claus scolding kids for eating cookies.

In all seriousness, I'm a bit concerned about how angry you sound calling your fellow employees and former co-workers all those names. I think you just need a hug. Or maybe a shrink? I'm not sure if our benefits would cover that though... darn!

Now I know you said this website is full of crap, and how any typing here is a waste of your precious time. But I really hope you respond to this thread some more so we can work out your inner demons.

Submitted by pdxhopeful on Sat, 08/16/2008 - 1:04pm.

I worry your comments may have been misdirected.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 08/19/2008 - 9:07pm.

We worry that your comment was absurd. The original post was spot on.
Your faux 'suspicion" was just that - a faux suspicion. Please avoid sharing these thoughts in this room as the general level of intellectualism is far above any you exhibit.

Submitted by Beckham on Thu, 08/14/2008 - 12:19am.

The best way to earn friends in the TV business? TEAR THEM DOWN!

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 08/25/2008 - 3:34pm.

Anonymous Source wrote:

Weaklings. I'd be happy to list you by name, because I know who you are.

As a former KEZI employee I wonder if you think I'm one of the "weaklings."

For the record, a little over a year ago I commented on this site that KEZI's atmosphere was toxic and that its employees were largely to blame; I was told that I would "go far" within Chambers management, even though, as I explained, my intention was to use KEZI as a jumping board to bigger, much better things. Which is exactly what I did; which proves me totally right and everyone else incontrovertibly wrong. I win, nyah, nyah nyah.

That is all.

Submitted by sparklewave on Thu, 08/07/2008 - 6:55pm.

Is the live broadcast of a national radio show on an unrelated station really worthy of being covered on the 5,6 and 11:00 news? I hardly think that a newscast not having time to air a THIRD report about Al Franken visiting Eugene qualifies as evidence that Korenza Burris is a bad anchor.
I think she does have personality. I for one am tired of 20-somethings who look and sound like they just got out of college.
For a while there they had Holly Menino and Kim Stark as co-anchors. On their own, each is ok, but together they were practicaly unlistenable.
I agree the current team is also pretty bad. Holly and ....whatever his name is...don't have any chemistry with each other or the audience.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 08/08/2008 - 2:05am.

First, many different local personalities, some with national prominence, were interviewed on that nationally broadcasted live radio show, in front of a local sold out audience. Subjects ranged from local, national and international affairs, including constructive discussion about education, health care, the economy, culture, politics, volunteering in our community...you name it was covered. The event was indeed THE local story of the day. The story was not about Franken himself. It was about the diversity of the guests, the varied subject matter and the response of the audience.

If it were any other national radio host doing a similar live national radio show in front of a live audience at our local public junior college with such a wide range of local guests, I would say the same thing. That is, the event deserves quality coverage. Are you sure you are not taking issue just because it was Al Franken? I would like to see any current popular national conservative talk show host have the balls to do a live local show in Eugene (Sorry Lars, you are just not popular).

Poster, are you sure you did not work for the current administration choosing who could and could not be a federal attorney based on their political party affiliation?

Second, the viewers who watch the early evening news don't generally watch the late news and vice versa. That Friday viewers of KEZI late news were cheated from seeing coverage of a significant event in their area. Since I worked swing shift til 10 pm I almost missed out. Thankfully I switched channels in time to see coverage on both KVAL and KMTR. But those who stayed with KEZI were treated to bonus repeated day old stale coverage of the UofO mens basketball game played the night before, and then, the regular sports segment followed. Whoop-de-do. Sports overruled news.

Burris is too hyper amped and in need of a chill pill. Her inabilty to take a calm pause, and ability to talk over (and not mix in with) over the other anchors during the end of newscast banter sessions is severely annoying. Just watch poor ol John Fischers eyes roll whenever Burris speaks. She could have taken an etiquette course from Kim Stark. Too late for that. Last one out please turn out the lights.

Submitted by sparklewave on Fri, 08/08/2008 - 11:33pm.

Anonymous Source wrote:
First, many different local personalities, some with national prominence, were interviewed on that nationally broadcasted live radio show, in front of a local sold out audience. Subjects ranged from local, national and international affairs, including constructive discussion about education, health care, the economy, culture, politics, volunteering in our community...you name it was covered.

I'm well aware of what was covered during the broadcast, because I was there.

Anonymous Source wrote:
Are you sure you are not taking issue just because it was Al Franken?

Yes, I'm quite sure. I worked at KOPT at the time and I enjoyed Al Franken's show.

Anonymous Source wrote:
Poster, are you sure you did not work for the current administration choosing who could and could not be a federal attorney based on their political party affiliation?

Huh?? I guess you're asking if I'm a Republican. I have always been registered as an independent up until the last primary, when I registered as a Democrat so I could vote for Hillary.

If the event was covered on KEZI's 5 and 6, and on KMTR and KVAL, it was hardly ignored. It was also covered by the Register-Guard and I'm sure the Eugene Weekly was all over it.

To tell you the truth, I'm sorry we didn't have this online encounter sooner. I could have given you my collection of embroidered KOPT-logo clothing, because it sounds like you would have treasured it. Unfortunately I sold it at a yard sale.

This was fun. :) Have a good weekend.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 08/09/2008 - 1:47am.

ahh... so you were there. That explains why you could care less if a local news channel missed the boat on their late night news cast. Glad you're not a news producer in my local market.

BTW, KEZI is now hiring two executive producers, a newscast producer, an account executive, and a part-time production assistant (must be willing to work overnight and weekend hours, a four year degree is desirable... wondering how much Chambers pays over minimum wage for this one). Sounds like you would fit right in at KEZI. ;-)

I don't see any recruiting for anchor positions happening so are they sticking with what they got?

The real question now is will KEZI News cover it's own demise? Poor Scott.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 08/16/2008 - 5:01pm.

This past Tuesday, August 12, 2008, I happened to catch the 6:30-7:00 PM block of the Channel 9 News out of Eugene. The new anchors seemed in the vein of the old anchors. The weatherman appeared a bit subdued. Given the whirlwind pace of muggings that have occurred in the newsroom recently, his state of mind should seemed apropos. Everything was in its place until the Sports Report. The sports segment opened cold out of a station break. There was no Sports announcer on-set. No anchor-to-anchor bonhomie. But then, it’s only sports.

The squinky thing was, the entire sports block consisted of a single V/O-SOT exhorting the surge of golfing popularity in Bandon. The macro focus dealt with the alleged similarity between Bandon courses and those found in Scotland. The piece included more than one radiant comparison to St. Andrews, the Vatican City of Golf. Throughout the story, the Sports Reporter read his script as though he was, or had been, on location at the course. The reporter was never seen on camera and could have been anywhere.

The v/o consisted largely of extravagant adjectives, swirling superlatives and jazzy adverbs woven together in a bright, shining testimonial for the course. To lend additional credibility to the piece, the producer and editor (perhaps one in the same) dropped in a music track under the entire story. Not just any music, but a symphonic surge of swollen violins and luminous French horns. For a moment, it seemed I was at a Beethoven philharmonic, a concerto for the sports zealot.

Not content to be the sole source of adulation, the v/o was sporadically interrupted by sound bites. We hear from the course manager, the course greens-keeper, the clubhouse bartender and occasionally, a random person who might actually have played the course. Course employees predictably touted the benefits of their establishment. Even the barkeep, whose job is to inebriate the paying customers, lavished approbation on the facility. The “MOS, “real golfers,” rattled on about how terrific, how wonderful, how marvelous, how tremendous the whole Bandon golf scene had become. By one account, Bandon was a perfect blend of Augusta National and Pebble Beach. I suspect these folks were Chamber of Commerce types, although the lower-third supers identifying them were on screen for milliseconds – too quick to know with certainty.

The v/o regaled the viewer with breath-taking, hole-by-hole descriptions. The reporter diagnosed every dogleg, reminisced on each rough, glorified every green. No aspect of the course was sub-par. Each fairway a pristine avenue. Each sand trap an exquisite challenge. A golfer’s Mecca.

At the end of the piece, the Sports Anchor, donning a sonorous v/o, signed-off. The music swelled to a crescendo, causing my putter to tremble. The Newscast Director, obviously in sync with the mood of the piece, dissolved out to the news set in a slow, dramatic fashion. I could almost swear that the AnchorWoman (her name escapes me) was trying unsuccessfully to hold back a tear. As the music trailed softly under, the Anchor Man, who was clearly moved said, in his deep Ted Baxter tone, “We’ll be back after the break.”

Tonight, on Channel 9, we will witness the Sports Department’s infomercial for yet another golf course in Bandon. One can barely wait.

Simultaneous to viewing the candy-coated coverage on Channel 9, I stumbled across a couple of references to a recent article from Advertising Age magazine, the bible for marketers, public relations experts and creative pimps everywhere. The article quoted liberally from an interview with Mark Hass, the President of Manning, Selvage and Lee, “one of the largest U.S. public relations companies.” The premise of the article dealt with the practice of PR firms, ad agencies and advertising clients to use their financial clout as a way of applying pressure and influencing content for newspapers, television and other mass media outlets.

From the article, excerpted from: http://www.detroitmakeithere.com/article/20080807/DM02/239980613/-1

“A survey conducted in May 2008 on behalf of Manning, Selvage &Lee, and the trade publication PR Week found that nearly one in five senior marketers "say their organizations have bought advertising in return for a news story." The survey queried 252 U.S. chief marketing officers. "The survey also found that 10 percent of senior marketers said their organizations have had an implicit / non-verbal agreement with a reporter or editor that anticipated favorable coverage of their company or products in exchange for advertising," according to an MS&L press release.

The article goes on to say, “The sixth-annual MS&L Marketing Management Survey, done in conjunction with PRWeek, found that 19 percent of the 252 chief marketing officers and marketing directors surveyed said their organizations had bought advertising in return for a news story. That represents one in five senior marketers and is up from 17 percent last year.

"I'm not saying it's a huge problem," Hass said. "But 19 percent of senior marketers saying they do it constitutes a problem."

That's particularly true in this age of transparency. "One type of coverage you buy and the other you achieve through persuasive argument, making it a credible source of information and not something that has to be taken with a grain of salt," Hass said. "There needs to be credible, independent media, and the marketing industry should not be doing anything to undermine credible editorial quality."

This year's study also found that 8 percent of respondents, up from 5 percent in 2007, said their organizations paid or provided a gift of value to an editor or producer to place a news story about the company or one of its products. And 10 percent said their organizations have at one time or another had an "implicit/non-verbal agreement with a reporter or editor that you expect to see favorable coverage of your product or company in exchange for advertising."

Bearing in mind the findings above, in no way do I make any accusations against Channel 9. It is a fine organization, run by admirable people who are doing the best that they can during these trying times. What can be said is that the tone of the Sports Report on the Bandon area golf revival might, under certain circumstances, be thought of as…well, you get the drift.

Of course, we will never know for certain. We have no way of discovering if the voice-over Sports Anchor even exists. We can never know what machinations went on behind the scenes that caused News management to send a crew to Bandon. It is unlikely we will ever be able to read station policy guiding the separation of News and Sales. In the end, we’ll just never know…and neither will the viewing audience. Oh well, it is just sports!

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 08/17/2008 - 2:16pm.

r u saying Ch 9 sells time in the news?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 08/17/2008 - 10:27pm.

Someone really sliced off a loaf of crazy on this one.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 08/18/2008 - 5:04am.

Crazy is as crazy does

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 08/18/2008 - 5:44pm.

He does not exist. It's a voice machine the station uses for stuff like that. Someone else reads into it, and it changes their voice to that one. They don't use it often, but when they need to it's a pretty cool little device.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 08/19/2008 - 5:03pm.

If I remember correctly, it was an old Ampex Pitch-Shift 5000, an analog device from the late 70s.
Still, it seemed to work well.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 08/17/2008 - 5:48am.

I worked with both of these fine women broadcasters and I'll take Burris anyday.
Stark was more concerned with her hair than the news.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 08/18/2008 - 6:30am.

I worked with them both too and you are wrong. Stark had it all over Burris - big time.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 08/18/2008 - 10:28pm.

I think both anchors were on steroids. Just my two cents.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 08/09/2008 - 10:37am.

I for one still have all my embroidered KOPT-logo clothing. Just to be clear, who ever is claiming to have worked at KOPT and KEZI at the time, must be someone in production...not say any of the anchors or reporters :)

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 08/20/2008 - 12:03am.

Ummm ... you know ...
The Broadcast market as we know it is all going to change and put everything on its ear with in months ...
can't liberate on how and/or what ... But mark my words: this thing with KEZI, OSN, IMG and any other entity involved hasn't seen anything yet... This is just the beginning.
Getting back to the root of this thread:
If this is the IMG I think it is ... KEZI didn't stand a chance this is not a bad thing they have alot more on their plates to deal with. This could be a good thing for OSN and Sports in general for Eugene. But all the stations need to take heed that the identity they are trying to generate by fancy promos promoting their news department and not having the content to back it up ( not a boatload of VO's teases up the yin~yang that lead to even more unanswered questions in hopes that their viewers will tune in salivating like Pavlov's dog every time the bell ring ) but "Honest to God get the Community involved" Content only that will save the markets we have today. Save the money on the Rolling Bus billboards and the fancy full-page, Half-page, Quater-Page ads and put that back into your staff and get a REAL marketable wage for the Crew... MAYBE (just maybe) you will see a change in the on-air product that I read everyone complaining about. maybe a buy out or hostile take over of said station is what is needed ... If the present owners can't seem to make it happen maybe someone else can... 'nuff said... NEXT ?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 08/20/2008 - 3:02pm.

blaaaaaaaaaaaaandy beaver!

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 08/25/2008 - 7:59pm.

All this talk of KEZI management making bad choices is hogwash. Just look at Blandy Smith and Bryce Yawnslinger. TV gold!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Voting controls can be added to this post.
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
More information about formatting options