O: Reinhard Taking Early Retirement?

Submitted by LynnS on Wed, 10/08/2008 - 9:19pm.

WWeek is reporting today that Oregonian columnist David Reinhard may be taking the early retirement offer:

But before lefty readers rejoice that the columnist who calls himself “right on the Left Coast” has opined his last, there’s a caveat. Like other O staffers meeting the Oct. 6 buyout deadline, Reinhard has seven days to rescind his decision.

So that's Reinhard, Mitchell...anyone else we know taking the out?

( topics: )
Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 10/09/2008 - 6:58am.

Washington County courts reporter Holly Danks took the buyout. The O closed its Hillsboro bureau and is apparently opening an office in Cedar Mill to handle coverage of the Northwest's fifth most populous county. They've also stopped going to Hillsboro city council meetings.

Submitted by rifleman69 on Thu, 10/09/2008 - 3:11pm.

Why would they open up a shop in Cedar Mill when they have that big building in Cedar Hills across from the very old Safeway? Can't put a desk or two in that building?

Submitted by Freelancer on Thu, 10/09/2008 - 6:20pm.

Danks was a very good reporter. That is quite a loss. She is one of the people I always read.

Submitted by bigboy on Thu, 10/09/2008 - 12:58pm.

The O needs a new conservative voice. I regularly read and enjoy all of the opinion columns regardless of which way they lean. Contrary to some of the other columns, when I read Reinhard I rarely feel like I learned anything new.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 10/09/2008 - 7:15pm.

Go in peace, but go. The Oregonian needs a conservative voice, but Reinhard's smug tone just reinforces the small-minded stereotype that, despite the fresh lathering supplied by Sarah Palin, is bringing down the Ground Old Party. Give us something to think about, not a print version of Lars.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 10/09/2008 - 10:25pm.

All this ... and a new 75 cent newsstand price!

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 10/10/2008 - 12:45am.

Staffers: Doing More with Less. Readers: Paying More for Less

Too bad about the cuts really.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 10/12/2008 - 6:40am.

The Automotive advice columnist said Saturday that it was his last column. No more.
Even the only thing worth reading anymore in that paper is changing.....the comics page. Opus is leaving.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 10/10/2008 - 6:37pm.

Anyone else hear Kristian Foden-Vencil on NPR tonight?

Why do they have to go to Lake Oswego? Why not pick some more regular high school? Seriously.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 10/11/2008 - 9:26am.

I heard it. I liked it. But I found myself wondering, "Why do they have to go to Oregon? Why not pick some more regular state?"

Seriously.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 10/11/2008 - 10:40am.

Um, because public broadcasting is elitist?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 10/11/2008 - 7:31pm.

Please oh please let it be Jonathan Nicholas!

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 10/12/2008 - 7:29pm.

I couldn't believe they truncated TV Click. The one thing the O provided that nobody else does is the local listings for the entire day. Now they just offer the nighttime listings, which already are IN the daily paper. As a late nightowl and an at-home-during-midday person, I miss the late and daytime listings. Just one more reason to consider canceling my subscription.

I understand saving on newsprint but that was a ridiculous thing to cut -- even in Portland where nobody admits to watching TV.

If you're gonna cut, cut the AP stories I read a day ago on the Web.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 10/13/2008 - 1:15am.

Over the years I've read a few columns by Jonathan Nicholas, and as far as I can recall they were nothing more than a waste of ink. I just did a quick look on oregonlive.com and oregonlive.com/oregonian and didn't find much. Is he still writing?

The bigger question is why does the Oregonian need generic columnists at all? If I want leftist drivel I can read Frank Rich or Maureen Dowd. Similarly, the NY Times keeps David Brooks around as a token right winger. Is there enough of a local angle for this stuff for a newspaper in the 22nd largest media market to keep its own pundits on staff? Sports columnists, yes, people want and will pay for the local angle. But do people really want to read any other kind of local columnist?

Maybe it made sense many years ago, before radio, before cable TV, before "the Internets". But now I have access to Fox News on the right, MSNBC on the left, and thousands of bloggers all across the spectrum. And Matt Drudge does a great job of filtering it all for me! :-)

So what is the point of The Oregonian having Reinhard on staff?

Phantom Gremlin

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 10/13/2008 - 9:57am.

Jessica Bruder's byline appeared Sunday as "Special to..." in the Books section. The bio listed her as an adjunct at Columbia University in NY....She was in one of the metro bureaus...southeast? Only at the paper a couple years I think.

The week is up: who's in, and who's out?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 10/13/2008 - 10:44am.

LynnS wrote:

So that's Reinhard, Mitchell...anyone else we know taking the out?

State government reporter Dave Hogan is.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 10/13/2008 - 1:58pm.

Hogan does good stuff. I hope it isn't true.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 10/13/2008 - 4:16pm.

You don't keep a newspaper strong by letting people like Hogan and Walden leave. Hard to believe losing good people like this is what Stickel/Rowe/Bhatia had in mind when they formulated this plan.

Very sad days for the mighty O.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 10/13/2008 - 5:11pm.

Interesting observations. I think a lot of these things are done for purposes of ego -- the bigger newspapers have had a tendency to do that over the years. Like sending reporters to far-flung places to cover events -- just so they could have a staff byline on the story -- instead of relying on the wire services. Another reason to do that was to win prizes, as if that's what really mattered. Meanwhile, not enough people were back home minding the store. But given the current economic health of the industry, those days are likely over. Newspapers will need to focus on what really does matter, and that's building local readership and advertising.
I still think there's a place for local columinsts if they are just that: local. Duin does a good job and, once upon a time, Doug Baker wrote a good column that was grounded in local material.
But the other stuff is, as you say, wasted ink and paper.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Voting controls can be added to this post.
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
More information about formatting options