O: Reinhard, Arrieta-Walden, Hogan, Hill, Green, Nkrumah Taking Buyout

Submitted by LynnS on Mon, 10/13/2008 - 4:06pm.

WWire is reporting that longtime O conservative columnist David Reinhard is definitely taking the buyout:

And here are some other notable names trickling out of The Oregonian newsroom as buyout takers: Michael Arrieta-Walden, one of the paper’s two managing editors; veteran reporters Dave Hogan (politics), Gail Kinsey Hill (energy) and Tony Green (courts).

WWire adds that Wade Nkrumah is also taking the buyout, and is becoming communications director for incoming mayor Sam Adams.

[corrected spelling of Michael Arrieta-Walden's name, which was in the original WWire story.--L]

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 10/13/2008 - 5:44pm.

Wow, some very solid reporters on that list. Such a loss to the paper and to the community. I wish them all well.

Submitted by JimL on Mon, 10/13/2008 - 8:51pm.

... perhaps the Big O will find a thoughtful conservative columnist who will do some original thinking to challenge some of our assumptions.

At some point, DR seemed to just take the morning fax from the RNC and rewrite it. The past several years have been exercises in trying to snatch political victory from the jaws of practical defeat through such tired devices as setting up a straw man argument (X voted against funding for our troops. X is a liberal. Therefore liberals hate our country) and proceeding to slay it.

It would be good to have a young George Will or David Brooks here to slay some real dragons. They do exist. Just count the manager to worker ratio in the city of Portland. There's plenty to do here.

Submitted by niceoldguy on Tue, 10/14/2008 - 12:15am.

I see a couple of names of smart people who surely have plans to go places. the O will miss them, as will readers, but I would expect them to be fine.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 10/14/2008 - 6:26pm.

As the "O" sheds its more experienced people, there become fewer and fewer reasons to either subscribe or read the paper.

Although I'm not ignorant to the current economics at work here, this becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy of demise, aka implosion. The key is to become creative and widen the revenue stream to maintain qulaity of service so that one is positioned to maintain market share as the economy recovers.

FWIW, the same principles apply to local TV stations when they fail to do a good job of hiring the best people to cover local events and provide useful and pertinent information.

Once gone, its never regained.

Submitted by pdxcess on Tue, 10/14/2008 - 10:25pm.

There are lots of talented people who can write for the O. They'll just come in for a lesser paycheck. Whether they can match or surpass the quality will be seen in time. Meanwhile, the folks who are left will do a lot more work, and the O won't be able to cover as much news. The economy is hurting all businesses, not just media. Remember when the Sunday car ads used to be full pages?
The big names leaving the O are making a good decision. Where else are you going to get two years pay, and health benefits, for NOT coming to work? It's a no brainer. It's a much more generous offer than most companies would make. I wish Dave, Renee, Wade & all the best of luck. It was great at the O while it lasted.

Submitted by rfaaberg on Wed, 10/15/2008 - 12:44am.

Only thing is 2 years goes by amazingly fast; I personally know that 6 years goes by really fast. I'm saved by a defined-benefit retirement system that I paid into for well over 2 decades.

I doubt the O's folks have that luxury, but I could be wrong.

I certainly wish them well. Until the last year or so, I loved the O. Now, it feels sort of "stripped" down to the minimum, and I get more depth and breadth on the internets.

Fwiw
VR

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 10/14/2008 - 10:58pm.

pdxcess -

The O is in the midst of a hiring freeze that has lasted more than a year now. And they're snobby about the people they'd even consider hiring.

I moved here more than a year ago with the hopes of learning the area (and, well, just finding a darn job here in the greatest city on earth) at a smaller non-daily, then landing elsewhere. What the O told me on no uncertain terms was that unless I was at a daily, I had no shot — past experience and present performance being entirely irrelevant.

Really a crushing blow for a journalist looking to set up stakes here. So I have little sympathy for Broadway.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 10/17/2008 - 10:32am.

You shouldn't be crushed. Hell, you shouldn't even be surprised. Big papers are choosy; they can afford to be. Whatever the O's problems -- and judging from this site, it has a lot of them -- it's still very highly regarded in the industry, and it's in a terrific city. I'm sure they got resumes by the truckload even before the business started going to hell and laying off journalists by the thousands. Moving to a big city and trying to get into its daily paper is a huge gamble -- be grateful they leveled with you so you can concentrate your time and energy on jobs you've actually got a shot at.

Submitted by Freelancer on Wed, 10/15/2008 - 11:38am.

OK, I am going to show my ignorance once again...

There is an urban legend among weekly newspaper reporters in the state that working for the Oregonian is all milk and honey. The pay is well over $50k annually and you have a news assistant help you with research.

Is any of this true?

I am just curious.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 10/15/2008 - 12:09pm.

I don't work at the O., but any major metro's gonna pay well over $50K and have people (librarians, usually) to help with research. Look at the Newspaper Guild site (http://www.newsguild.org/scales/index.php?ID=4091) to get an idea of what salaries are like at different papers. The O's not union, but look at similarly sized shops.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 10/15/2008 - 12:20pm.

Yes on the pay, especially for those who have been there a long time. Benefits are good too, although they're not as generous as they were 20 years ago. But the research department has been cut to the bones, just one or two researchers now.

Submitted by niceoldguy on Wed, 10/15/2008 - 10:21pm.

I left years ago and the 50K figure was way too low then, more so now. Research help, as of when I was there, was outstanding. (We had helpful library folks for decades, but internet researchers who could give you the phone number of the former next door neighbor of the source you were trying to find is more recent. A real time-saver.)
Milk and honey? Pre-Rowe the backstabbing and jealousies were the stuff of novels, and the sheer incompetence was staggering.
Rowe raised standards, but the jockeying the new management and staff enlargement (staffing budget increases had more to do with the quality change than any person) made for much insecurity. But you sure as heck could do stories, take cabs or planes as needed, etc. Still, weeklies, if relatively fearless, were pure fun. You actually know most of the people you piss off.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 11/03/2008 - 9:30pm.

Back in 1987 one of the assistant city editors left a stack of pay stubs in a communal drawer at the City Desk. She'd been at The O ~two years at the time (on top of maybe eight to 10 years daily experience elsewhere) and was grossing $50k per annum given my back of the envelope calculations for 37.5 hours per week. My understanding then was that veteran reporters were topping out ~$45K, copydeskers a bit less. (Niceoldguy has a better feel for that than I do.)

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 10/16/2008 - 7:34pm.

As an Oregonian employee, I didn't really realize that things were this tough until they told us they were going to convert all the full-time harem girls and cabana boys to part-time. I can't help but wonder: Who's going to plop grapes in my mouth when I'm on deadline?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 10/19/2008 - 11:40pm.

Whisper is before Sam Adams group went after Wade Nkrumah, they offered to KATU's Anna Song, who turned them down. What's with the mayor's office and the pursuit of a journalist for this role?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Voting controls can be added to this post.
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
More information about formatting options