Big fat mess for WWeek's Karla Starr

Submitted by Writergrrl on Thu, 08/24/2006 - 11:17am.

Karla Starr, who writes the "Words Listings" column of book-related events for Willamette Week, included the following in her 8/23 column:

"Are you a fatty? Want to be in a book? Waddle over to a computer, grab your typing stick (those sausage fingers hit too many keys at once, don't they?), go to stacybias.net, and fill out the contact form for your chance to contribute to Bias' FatGirl Speaks, a short-fiction anthology inspired by her event of same name."

Starr's office voicemail was reportedly so overwhelmed by the number of phone calls she received on Wednesday that callers couldn't get through,and were told by the front desk that Starr wasn't listening to her voicemails. Editor Kelly Clark e-mailed writer/fat activist Stacy Bias about the incident, but seems unclear on what the fuss is about; Bias recounts the e-mail exchange in her blog.

UPDATE by Lynn: This week's letters to the editor are almost entirely on this remark, and contain Starr's response.

( topics: )
Submitted by shifty on Thu, 08/24/2006 - 11:25am.

Buy'em some cupcakes and they'll shut the hell up.

What?

Submitted by LynnS on Thu, 08/24/2006 - 11:39am.

And thought about writing to ask her out to tea so she could say that to my fat face. But I couldn't find my typing stick so I forgot about it.

whatEVER. I'm so sick of fat women being the last group it's okay to target.

-----
Lynn Siprelle * Fairy Blogmother

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 08/24/2006 - 3:41pm.

Actually, it's a bit more okay to pick on uber-skinny girls. People are starting to be sensitive to overweight women, but it was all right to hound me if I was anorexic or bulimic. When I said "no," they thought I must be in denial and badgered me to seek counseling. If they weren't being "sensitive," they were being horribly mean and saying I look disgusting, ugly, like a skeleton, etc. I put up with constant criticism for 10 years (12-years-old to 22), until my metabolism relaxed a bit and I gained 20 pounds. However, I'm still thin, so I still get comments, just not as many. Sorry about the rant, but I am tired of overweight people complaining that everyone picks on them. It's not easy on the opposite end of the spectrum either. In fact, many overweight women find it all right to pick on the uber-skinny girls. Those were the majority that said something to me.

Also, homosexual men and woman also get picked on frequently.

Submitted by LynnS on Thu, 08/24/2006 - 3:54pm.

How come it's still okay for strangers to comment on women's bodies *at all*? And I can understand what you mean, I have a friend who probably weighs 90 pounds dripping wet and she reports similar experiences to yours. She doesn't *try* to be that thin, she just is.

-----
Lynn Siprelle * Fairy Blogmother

Submitted by Cablenut on Thu, 08/24/2006 - 4:29pm.

People outside one's own monkeysphere aren't considered people. They are abstracts. They exist, but seeming for the pleasure of oneself, not their own justified existence. I wish this was a phenomenon restricted to the states, but I have a friend who lives and teaches in (ostensibly over-polite) Japan. She is not insubstantial, size-wise. She is a big, brash Irish American gal. No bones about it either. She often gets asked, by strangers on the train, why she is the size she is. Anectdotally, I have heard the same converstations taking place in public in Korea, France, Russia, England, Rio, and Bhopal.

Oh, and this happens to men, too. Just not quite as frequently, and often it is a power-play over those percieved to be weaker. Jocks vs. Openly gay guy in the locker room, etc.

-------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: my opinions are my own, not those of OMI or any employer.

Submitted by Cablenut on Thu, 08/24/2006 - 4:04pm.

Lets all just take a chill pill, folks.

One day we'll figure out that the only reason we get picked on is cuz people are RUDE, not because they are biased (or rather, in ADDITION to their being biased.) We are ALL victims in one sense or another. We can either embrace that victimhood or just give up, and expect people to treat us reasonable. I vote for the latter.

Oh, and the correct response to someone pickin' on your fat/skinny/gay/lezbo/tranz/breeder/ugly/white/dumb ass, is "Buzz off!" very loudly, in their face. Most folks will leave you alone at that point.

JJ

edited to add the following: Of course, they might just think you are another nutcase, but at least its gets 'em out of your face.

-------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: my opinions are my own, not those of OMI or any employer.

Submitted by Cablenut on Fri, 08/25/2006 - 7:32am.

I should point out that I was once the token straight in Queer Nation, and i am in a GLTB shooting club.

I am not some nutball homophobe. I forget that most of you folks don't know me. My apologies for the confusion.

-------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: my opinions are my own, not those of OMI or any employer.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 08/27/2006 - 11:48am.

If you don't care what people think of you, why the need for "clarification?" Sounds like someone has a case of Portland PC Tourette's Syndrome.

Submitted by LynnS on Sun, 08/27/2006 - 1:27pm.

and, BTW, Cablenut and I are always available for a cup of coffee, we like meeting readers, you would SO not say that. :)

-----
Lynn Siprelle * Fairy Blogmother

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 08/28/2006 - 2:12pm.

I'm sure that you and Cablenut are not homophobic or whateverphobic.

But the "if you only knew me" line is exactly the one that Karla Starr is sending out in response to the very statement to which you objected.

As journalists, we can only expect people to know us by what we write, not by what we believe about ourselves.

Submitted by LynnS on Mon, 08/28/2006 - 2:52pm.

Cablenut, in his defense, is not a journalist nor ever has been. He often writes as he writes to friends, and in a forum like this, that sometimes don't work so well. :)

-----
Lynn Siprelle * Fairy Blogmother

Submitted by Cablenut on Mon, 08/28/2006 - 11:15am.

It was pointed out to me by my lovely wife that some folks might take my comments (or this BLOG as a whole) the wrong way, and dismiss them out of hand. That would be a shame. I clarified so that folks didn't think that I *was* a racist homophobe who doesn't like fat, asian, jewish, arabic speaking, monacle wearing, goldtoothed midgets.

Indeed, I am rather fond of monocles. They look so distinguished :-)

-------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: my opinions are my own, not those of OMI or any employer.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 08/24/2006 - 4:07pm.

It's not right at all. When I was a kid, I had tons of self-esteem and confidence. It was my truest self, which is like most kids. But over the years, it's been picked pretty clean.

All I can say for the WW is that they, like the Mercury, are un-PC because it's edgy. They think that by saying what some people are thinking, then they can get more readership. Or perhaps they are just reveling in the idea that they will not be reprimanded like other media.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 08/24/2006 - 7:56pm.

You get what you pay for.

WW = free.

Enough said.

Submitted by tvprintradio on Fri, 08/25/2006 - 9:41am.

is a bad review. it is similarly easy to write gross-out material. it's the default position of the past couple of generations. stop it. you're as over as a mowhawk and silver chains... and just as tiresome.
thank god other generations are coming along to make fun of them.

Submitted by Lance Phree on Fri, 08/25/2006 - 11:24pm.

Callousness towards the mass-challenged women of the world may be the least of La Starr's current problems.

From what I have been given to understand by some friends who work there, the presumably fat-free Starr has been involved in a major contretemps with a certain local institution. On the one hand, Starr's bosses remain shielded from the reasons for, indeed even deeper knowledge of, the contretemps itself, while on the other hand the local institution has become a house divided as it wrestles over what to do about Starr.

Within the next two weeks, expect one of two things to happen. Either this major institution will be caught with its pants down, while a local publication will suffer a massive black eye on its big fat puss when its ever so literary correspondent is exposed for what she really is, a ... but that would be telling.

Or, what could happen is .... nothing.

Still, check the headlines for the next two weeks!

But, remember, dear readers, you heard it here first, off the record, on the QT, and very hush hush.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 08/27/2006 - 11:51am.

I love it! Thanks for the laugh.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 08/28/2006 - 11:19am.

Lance... seriously. You're gossiping about Karla Starr's involvements with a 'local institution' that has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the article she wrote for WW?! Please, there's lots to do in Portland.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 08/30/2006 - 8:27am.

Willamette Week commits this kind of faux-pas quite regularly. The problem is that the editors there are a bunch of middle-aged cultural conservatives trying desperately to sound young, hip and edgy like the Mercury. Since they are none of those things in real life, it's no wonder they keep putting their feet in their mouths. Past episodes are too numerous to count but include using a group of all black kids as the photographic backdrop for a school violence story; a cartoon featuring the Pope calling himself the N-word; and the use of the callous phrase "six feet under" to describe gallery pioneer William Jamison when he died of AIDS. This latest is just par for the course.

Submitted by Lance Phree on Thu, 08/31/2006 - 10:03am.

The editor of WW was on Air America's local show yesterday wildly praising Starr, while neglecting to mention the fistfull of letters printed in the paper about her "sausage fingers' column.

Submitted by thedude on Wed, 09/06/2006 - 3:15pm.

Well it's been 1/2 an hour, so I think I screwed up while posting my last post.
So here's the short version.
Signal editor read this blog, decided to write a column.
Here's the link: http://www.seasidesignal.com/opinion/

Submitted by pdxmediagrrl on Mon, 09/18/2006 - 1:30am.

My letter was one of those 200+ letters recieved, and while the notion of the actual event did surprise me, particularly because of the multiple pot shots taken by Ms. Bias in their weekly, (This isn't the first time...)The goal was achieved and the issue was resolved from a personal and professional perspective.

Kudos to Karla, and BTW, if you're reading this... Where'd your spunk go??

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Voting controls can be added to this post.
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
More information about formatting options