Woodward: Too close, too long

Submitted by t.a. barnhart on Sat, 11/19/2005 - 10:36am.

this is an excellent critique of Woodward's fall from grace, and a warning to all who forget the tale of Icarus.

[Edited for fair use. Please don't quote entire articles, folks.--L]

November 19, 2005
Tim Rutten: Regarding Media
Woodward joins a decadent dance

Woodward's disclosure was motivated not by a sudden pang of conscience, as it turns out, but by the sudden necessity of testifying under oath before a federal grand jury. Along the way, he incidentally revealed not only that he had concealed this information from his editors and readers for fear of subpoena, but also that he had in the interim gone on several television shows to trash the special prosecutor investigating the affair. Moreover, it now emerges, the reporting that went into his last best-selling book, "Plan of Attack," involved the submission of written questions in advance to Vice President Dick Cheney, a fact he never bothered to share with the book's readers.

There is something singularly appropriate about the fact that the Plame affair should involve Woodward, whose skillful and courageous use of the ur-voice among confidential sources virtually created a whole genre of Washington reporting. It's a journalistic strategy style dependent on the cultivation of access to well-placed officials greased by promises of "confidentiality." It's a way of doing journalism that still serves its practitioners' career interests, but less and less often their readers or viewers because it's a game the powerful and well-connected have learned to play to their own advantage.

( topics: )
Submitted by Anonymous Source on Sun, 11/20/2005 - 1:45am.

Not buying it. Rutten's piece reeks of sour grapes. (I had better knock back some Advil to prevent a hangover after reading that.) Yes, Woodward is "powerful and well-connected" and most of us who have spent time as journalists aren't. We could hum "It should have been me." But, unlike Rutten we have enough self-respect not to. Truth of the matter? Woodward could not get the information he does from his A-list sources if he wasn't A-list himself. Is that fair? No, but little in life is. Rutten and others hoping Woodward is "in trouble' are going to be disappointed. If anything, the latest pie Woodward has been discovered to have a finger in will heighten interest in his books.

Submitted by t.a. barnhart on Sun, 11/20/2005 - 1:56pm.

i had to read The Brethren in some poli sci class, and i found nothing to trust in it. i prefer to know at least a couple of sources. woodward has been playing this game for years. he's been swallowed up by a system he once fought. he's become what he once attacked.

the point being not rutten or woodward but (this being a media insiders site) the danger of being too much of an insider. of not keeping distance from your sources. just ask eric mason.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Voting controls can be added to this post.
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
More information about formatting options