"Roberta Altstadt. Gone."

Submitted by LynnS on Wed, 09/27/2006 - 2:44pm.

That's the entire message from an Anonymous Insider about KATU's EP. Anyone have more details?

Edited to Add: The subject line of the email was "KATU lets its EP go," so I'm assuming she wasn't heading for greener pastures under her own power.

( topics: )
Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 09/27/2006 - 5:44pm.

We had an internal e-mail from the news director saying she no longer works here. The rumors are that he wanted someone who would go in the same direction as him. Apparently, she didn't agree with some of his decisions.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 09/27/2006 - 9:48pm.

The fears in the newsroom are that the new agenda is crime all the time. Now that's an intelligent approach. Another KPTV, that's just what the market needs.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 09/28/2006 - 9:39am.

It's all Pratt knows - crime news.

Submitted by Zamboni on Thu, 09/28/2006 - 11:54am.

...but crime is the easiest thing to cover if you are new to town.
For that matter - it's just plain easy to cover.
Simple plot lines, white hats/black hats, etc.
Digging in to other topics requires a little institutional knowledge.
Not much of that left in TV these days.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 09/28/2006 - 12:31pm.

One of the reporters there told me that they had a meeting discussing focusing on more investigative pieces, not crime.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 09/28/2006 - 1:09pm.

if he has been hired to bring up ratings, then why condemn him for making changes?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 09/28/2006 - 5:12pm.

If you've been watching KATU recently it's obvious the new guy is turning The Spirit of the Northwest into the Spirit of Murder and Mayhem. As the previous poster mentioned, this is really easy to do. Just wait for the e-mails from the local cop shops. It will appeal only to the lowest common demoninator. KATU was the last station to make an effort to cover important issues. That's apparently gone. This appears to be a good opportunity for KGW.

Submitted by bigboy on Mon, 01/14/2008 - 12:23pm.

I would say K2 has emphasized crime coverage much less over the last several months and they seem to be putting some real effort behind the "On Your Side" and "Problem Solvers" branding.

They're far from perfect but I think K2's news product is on a positive trajectory.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 09/28/2006 - 5:57pm.

Leave the guy alone. So far - he's great! We're actually doing some interesting stories and cleaning house! And no - it's not going more investigative. Good journalism. Let that be KATU's new motto.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 09/28/2006 - 7:28pm.

gee, is that what they call it now over at k2? what about before - 'bad journalism?' as often as i watch the station, i can't remember ever being overwhelmed by any story due to depth or complexity. face it, k2 like all the stations in town are awash with non-locals without perspective or context on the issues and institutions of this market. it's just the never-ending swirl of opens, music, graphics and animations - and the mock-seriousness of 'important' news delivered with officious pompousness by dunn and other anchor talking-head clone clowns. you know what would impress me? if the new news director - this pratt fellow - would get steve 'shift in my chair' dunn to sit still and deliver the news without the affected attitude. now that would be progress!

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 09/28/2006 - 7:20pm.

A good opportunity for KGW? Why? They're not taking the high road.
KGW's newscasts drip in blood. 8 covers as much crime as KPTV.

It was not this way 5 years ago. Consultants sold managers that
viewers want MORE crime. They're desperate and bought it.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 09/28/2006 - 10:16pm.

Can someone who still works there please tell us the real reason she was let go.. I still cannot figure out how someone incapable of producing the 11pm newscast became an executive producer...

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 09/29/2006 - 10:24am.

Rausch picked her.
Rausch got blown out in January.
Roberta follows in September.
No deep reasons needed. New guy either wants his own person -
or someone who can follow the new playbook.
At the end of the day, she'll be happier.
He'll be happier.
And the next time the news director changes, the same sort of thing
is likely to happen.
Apply. Rinse. Repeat.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 09/28/2006 - 10:29pm.

That just happens to be the big stories these days. Hello!!!! Someone is chopped up and tossed in the river, police kill a man, and a Beaverton guy shoots up his neighbor's house and sets his on fire. Should we ignore all of that? Is that not NEWS anymore? What would you prefer we cover? KATU hasn't dipped to the level of everyone else, covering every little sex offender. We're just covering the big stories and they happen to be crime related right now, not to mention slightly interesting.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 09/29/2006 - 9:58am.

As I see it... Roberta came to KATU as a Producer. She arrived at a time of transition for KATU a few years back. An opportunity presented itself for her, she painted the right picture for the new boss to see and was promoted to EP. When she was a producer, she was average. When she was EP her performance was below average. While Interim ND, her performance was again below average. I will say this, she works hard and is very dedicated. Problem was, dedication can't replace solid news judgement and more importantly she lacks the ability to do what an EP should be doing... working with the Producers, Reporters, and Writers at crafting the best possible presentation of our news coverage. Instead she was fixated on who is 5 min. late for work, or freaking out over how long it takes the helicopter to fly from Gresham to Beaverton. I wish her luck.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 09/29/2006 - 1:26pm.

I do not work at KATU. I have never wanted to work at KATU, but I have to say I've noticed a big change for the better since the new boss has come on board. They are aggressively going after stories, and getting interviews no one else has. They have some excellent reporters who are great story tellers. I am impressed. They're stepping up the competition, and that's a good thing. I'm tired of all the whiners on this board, angry people who can't give anyone credit for trying new things. As a viewer, and a competitor, I think KATU is on the right track.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 09/29/2006 - 6:48pm.

...I don't see it; just more hype.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 09/29/2006 - 6:22pm.

Roberta did an excellent job and worked harder than most anyone else in the newsroom. She has many fans and supporters. I wouldn't be listening to any comments to the contrary. Every news department (or organization) is made up of those who 'get it' and those who don't. Roberta got it and we should all wish her the very best!

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 09/30/2006 - 10:20am.

You should have seen the smiles on everyone's faces and the pure joy around the newsroom the last few days, now that's she's gone. She may have worked hard, but she did not know what she was doing. She had no people skills, no management skills, no news skills, and frankly, she wasn't a very nice person most of the days. Roberta DEFINATELY DID NOT GET IT. Obviously, that previous post is from one of her producers now fearing they're the next one to be cut. Trust me, that is not the opinion of the newsroom.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 09/30/2006 - 1:40pm.

Does the new ND promote from within KATU, try to pull a star from another station or does his new EP come from outside the Rose City?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 09/30/2006 - 3:45pm.

I agree with the previous poster. Most of the newsroom (with the exception of a couple of suck up producers) were very relieved when she was fired. To a lot of people, she could be a bully.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 09/30/2006 - 4:54pm.

it's "hear, hear!"

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 09/30/2006 - 7:41pm.

Hey, you may not have liked Roberta as a person. You may not have respected her news judgment or her writing skills. Essentially, she was a hard worker. And she did her best. This firing gives her time to focus on her family, which really does need her attention right now. So, I wish her the best. KATU may find itself in a better place with a new 2nd in command.

And let's all remember fondly the lore of how she got pissed once at KPTV and pulled a coke machine down. All 5'5" of her. She could be a toughy.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 10/01/2006 - 7:18am.

I hear that it was not just newsroom folks that didn't like her, it was most anyone that had anything to do with her. Maybe she was a hardworker, but you need to interact with people and if you rub them the wrong way, they won't "work" with you. You need to treat your colleagues with respect and get along with them (even if you don't like them). Maybe she wasn't really a bad person but the vibes and perceptions she gave off were not that good.

And, one important thing y'all need to remember is that perception is more important than reality...... because perception IS reality.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 10/01/2006 - 9:27am.

Roberta was a BIG pain in the ass to work
for, but she is a great person outside of
work. Roberta you have a lot of heart and I wish you the best of luck.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 10/01/2006 - 2:27pm.

Pratt should bring in some new blood, new energy.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 10/01/2006 - 3:36pm.

Anybody in town ready to make the leap to EP?
Or will it take someone with a fresh set of eyes on Portland news?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 10/01/2006 - 2:40pm.

I started out with Roberta as an intern. True she can be gruff and difficult. But I found if you were honest with her and strong in presentation, she respected that. She does have a good heart, and I even tried to tell her at times to cooperate better in communication. But she was "true" in her word when I knew her, and in this business it's very rare to find people true to their word. That's why I finally got out, no one was true to their word. I'll take gruff if I know someone is being honest deep down anyday, not two face like TV newsrooms so often are.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 10/01/2006 - 5:41pm.

There were several people that she hired for an overnight shift by telling them they would be promoted to days within a couple of months. Most of those people were still doing those shifts a year later. She just told them what they wanted to hear to fill a position most people wouldn't want. That was just one example of other ways she was not a completely honest with her employees.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 10/01/2006 - 7:50pm.

Lynn,

Why are you allowing these potentially libelous posts against Roberta? I thought you were taking a higher road with this site? This is shameful. How would you feel if such comments were being made about you?

Submitted by LynnS on Sun, 10/01/2006 - 8:19pm.

Some people say they liked her, some people say they didn't like her. Some people say they liked her, but not at work. I'm not seeing anyone saying she drives a pickle wagon, but I'll have Cablenut swing through and see what he thinks.

And people have said far, far worse about me.

-----
Lynn Siprelle * Fairy Blogmother

Submitted by Cablenut on Sun, 10/01/2006 - 9:45pm.

The truth of the matter is that none of this is libelous. Some of it is distasteful, and comes close, but does not meet the definition of "libel."

We are faced with an odd circumstance here. If we began censoring ALL negative information about participants in our little sphere, we would be in a precarious position, as there would inevitably be a comment or two that snuck through. Under Max V. Dimeo, we would increase our culpability, not lessen it.

If we are going to start censoring comments we view as not *nice*, then we might as well just give up, and either open up comments again without review, or go away entirely. Not gonna happen.

I sense a "kick her while she is down" feel in some of these comments, and I am rather appalled at folks' posting, but I don't make up the posts.

I would urge those who wish to disparage others to consider that when THEY are let go (and it happens to all of us,) the tone will have been set, and the same comments may be made about YOU. Consider your posts in that light.

I urge all employers looking at this site to remember that there are *always* people who don't like a prospective employee, and that won't ever change. The best bet is to judge a person by their skillset and their tape, and NOT by the anonymous comments on a silly website.

-------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: my opinions are my own, not those of OMI or any employer.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 10/01/2006 - 9:03pm.

For starters... any intern that gets hired for any shift in market (what is it now 23) should count their blessings.
Who in the hell do they think they are anyway! Maybe these cry babies should go start working in market 150 and then work their way up. Geez!

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 10/02/2006 - 2:34am.

I remember years ago working at a station in Portland. You had to have verified experience before they would even talk to you about potentially working in this town in this business.

Then it eventually came down to answering the question "Have you ever watched TV?" before they would talk to you.

Now, if you walk off the street and you can spell the word "TV" (not television... that is too hard), and have no experience, you are hired and they will train you over a long time.

Of course, with today's technology, you really don't have to know anything to make television.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 10/01/2006 - 10:58pm.

Not all of us are interns, don't make that assumption. Some of us had years of experience in other markets before coming here.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 10/06/2006 - 12:33pm.

Here is the problem with the Portland tv
market... hardly anyone leaves. You either
stay in the market or get out of news. It's
really not much of a springboard.My point,
is you may have been a big fish in a small
market, but once you come to Portland, you
are a peon and always will be one.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 01/13/2008 - 11:04pm.

People stay in Portland because of the incredible location. Several people in news could have moved much higher, but it's a great place to raise a family and the city is hard to beat.

Wayne Garcia left Seattle, then Los Angeles markets because "it's his favorite job in his favorite city."

Jeff Gianola and Steve Dunn, similar situations.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Tue, 10/03/2006 - 11:27am.

it is alarming to me that someone seemingly in the business would be so quick to use the "l" word. You are weak-minded and I hope you are not a media attorney, or in any position to make editorial decisions (please don't sue me!!) Here's a reference for you to get up to speed. http://medialibel.org/libel/

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 10/04/2006 - 7:29pm.

This is just plain fascinating.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 10/06/2006 - 12:21am.

thats all i got to say about that.

Submitted by Zamboni on Fri, 10/06/2006 - 10:10am.

Wish my aim was better.

(Old jokes like this killed vaudeville.)
(Vaudeville was...oh, never mind.)

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 01/12/2008 - 12:05pm.

Call me old fashion and sexist... but I have never met a woman executive producer I liked.

It takes "Nerd Level" dedication to be good at it.

"Nerd Level" dedication = Hopelessly absent personal life.

Women, generally, have some level of personal life... Meanwhile, there's a rapidly growing population of males who do not.

Yes, the 40-year-old virgin would make a righteous ep... ;-)

Submitted by LynnS on Sat, 01/12/2008 - 1:25pm.

You're old-fashioned and sexist.

I worked with EP Cynthia Griffin at KGW in the early 90s and she was Awesome with a capital A, and extremely kind.

How many likable execs of any gender have you known in this business? It's not really a business of likable people at that level.

-----
Lynn Siprelle * Fairy Blogmother

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 01/12/2008 - 5:02pm.

She is very good and seems to be well-liked by her producers.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 01/13/2008 - 12:40pm.

She's fantastic and very willing to get into the trenches with her show producers and anybody else on the staff.
She also supports her production staff when it comes to battles with management.
One of the hardest workers I've ever met in many years in the business.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 01/14/2008 - 12:56pm.

The current EP at KGW is not universally liked. She's a favorite of the corner pocket, that's true, but a lot of people know her as a newsroom gossip who isn't afraid to stab people in the back.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 01/14/2008 - 2:29pm.

Name one person who has ever worked in newsroom management.. just one.. who is universally liked. YOU may not like KGW's EP but to say " alot of people" feel that way is just not true and I think you know that. I wish more people here would own up to their opinion as theirs and theirs only. I work in that newsroom and you're not speaking for "a lot of people"

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 01/14/2008 - 4:18pm.

It sounds like you haven't been playing well with others. If you can't get along with the EP, the problem is definitely with you.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Voting controls can be added to this post.
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
More information about formatting options