Cyber Sting Copycats

Submitted by pdxtvwatcher on Thu, 02/08/2007 - 6:34pm.

Yesterday (Wednesday 2/7/07) was a very interesting news day. KPTV had some "Breaking News" during their morning show about an underage cyber-sex sting & arrest at PDX. Apparently, this "Breaking News" was planned; KPTV was working with authorities to bust this guy as part of their "Cyber Sting 2007" sweeps series. The plan was to have an undercover reporter follow the guy as he caught a flight from Seattle to PDX, and then have another reporter & crew at PDX to video his arrest & interview him about his intentions. It worked as planned, and made for some interesting TV.

What was most interesting, however, was how the other stations in town responded. KATU, KOIN and KGW each did a story on it (the bust, but not KPTV's role in it). KGW actually led with the story on their (CW) 10pm newscast last night. Not surprisingly, KPTV's 10pm lead story was the morning's bust -- but, of course, KPTV had their exclusive video and sound. This morning's newscasts were similar... KOIN even had their sole morning reporter covering the story live from PDX.

Was this story really so appealing & important that all the stations felt they should not only cover it, but lead with it? Or, was it a tactic by the other stations to dilute the significance of KPTV's "get" by eliminating the exclusivity and impact of it?

Regardless, yesterday was very telling. KPTV gets slammed quite often for their filthy news content by folks who work at other stations, yet the other stations jumped at the chance to follow KPTV's lead yesterday. The whole thing smells like a classic case of, "If you can't beat 'em... join 'em."

I am now a firm believer that attacks on KPTV's content are baseless if they're coming from people who work for other stations. All the stations are doing the same type of stories now; yesterday was proof enough of that. The only difference is that KPTV stands out as the leader of the lemmings.

( topics: | | | )
Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 02/08/2007 - 7:10pm.

this is pathetic. a tv station that makes the news for themelves. what ever happened to journalism? seriously.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 3:16pm.

All you alls, listen up. And I mean ALL YOU ALLS!!!!
News is about reporting the facts. Fact, multiple law enforcement agencies conducted an internet sting to catch online predators looking for sex from minor children. Fact, a man agreed to meet a teen at a specific location at PDX. Fact, the man flew from Seattle to PDX and ended up at that specific location in order to meet said minor child. Fact, police took the man into custody. Fact, it was reported by KPTV with the blessings of said multiple law enforcement agencies. This is news, and in the larger scheme of things, news is meant to incite debate and discussion. A majority of you watched and are now debating and discussing. This is news.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 02/08/2007 - 7:17pm.

I'm sorry, maybe I'm a "purist", but a planned event is NEVER breaking news. Call it a "developing story" at best, or an "investigation" at worst, which it really was.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 02/08/2007 - 7:57pm.

Now now children. Just because you missed the opportunity to cover the story, doesn't mean it wasn't breaking news. The fact is, the guy had been arrested just minutes before. He was being led out of the airport in handcuffs. It was breaking as Good Day Oregon was on the air.
Better luck next time.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 02/08/2007 - 10:52pm.

..if you attitude reflects the professionalism (or lack thereof) found at KPTV, then my Nielson eyes will be tuned elsewhere. Hopefully others will do the same.

You should be ashamed of your blantant grandstanding over a story you created. That's just as pathetic as that chump you had arrested.

You're p*ssing all over broadcast journalism, and if you're not ashamed by that..then you're beyond help.

There are good people at KPTV, but judging by your 8th grade taunts, you're not one of them.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 02/08/2007 - 9:15pm.

No reason here...I don't even work in Portland TV news. ("Breaking News?" author)...best of luck to you as well.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 02/08/2007 - 9:41pm.

You know... stories like this are interesting.
However: I'd much rather watch Dateline NBC's big budget professional version of the story than KPTV's poorly produced, thrown together, over-hyped pkg.

I believe the first time I saw a local affiliate do this was when KCTV reporter Steve Chamraz put together a very nice series of stories with the help of Portland-based Pervertedjustice.com.

That same year (2004) several other affils did the same thing with mixed results. KPTV's was absolutely pathetic.

I have to say... that after several years of trying their version is improving. But, relatively speaking, still amateur.

Submitted by Christiana on Thu, 02/08/2007 - 9:54pm.

You have got to be kidding. I'm just a regular viewer and it just don't ring true for me. I lost some respect for KPTV. To me breaking news isn't something that you have a hand in it is something that happens and then you cover. It is just the opinion of a regular viewer.

Submitted by Christiana on Thu, 02/08/2007 - 9:55pm.

it should have been spelled. But I stand by everything else.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 02/08/2007 - 11:17pm.

...and not a journalist (anymore), I don't know what's more sickening... the pedophiles going after innocent children (very, very wrong), or the sensationalism going on now in broadcast journalism, just to get ratings (equally, if not more, wrong).

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 02/08/2007 - 11:25pm.

After all, this IS KPTV we're talking about. Nothing is too low in their eyes. Way to go KPTV!!

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Thu, 02/08/2007 - 11:39pm.

You make some interesting points, but how is it NOT solid journalism when KPTV does it, but it is when Dateline does it? I work at KPTV, and yes, there are times when I cringe at some of the stories we do. But I'd be willing to bet there are employees at all of the stations who feel that way sometimes. As for the Cyber Sting, it made for good TV, it stopped some creepy guys from trolling for little girls on the internet, and it was a group effort involving several law enforcement agencies. Kerry Tomlinson wasn't sitting at her work computer trying to lure men to meet her. It was an official sting operation, and Fox 12 got to come along for the ride, and catch it all on camera. It just seems to me that no matter what KPTV does, it gets bashed. But after all this time, we're used to it.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 9:19am.

This sting was a police operation. In the old days, when reporters had 'beats' to check, they would hear about stories like this all the time. 20 years ago in Boise, our station followed police on numerous busts. News has gotten fat and lazy. The story has merit. The execution may have been a little rough, but don't shoot the messenger.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 11:08am.

"but how is it NOT solid journalism when KPTV does it, but it is when Dateline does it?"

It is NOT solid journalism when Dateline does it. I don't have a problem with what pervertedjustice does, but when Dateline pays them to do it, I do have some ethics questions.
When Dateline, a 'news' organization pays a company to lie to people, not only are they creating news, but they are broadcasting to the nation that they are not to be trusted.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 2:41pm.

Not in this sting. It was all law enforcement, federal and local. No one was chatting online with the pervs who was not a member of law enforcement.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 02/12/2007 - 12:12pm.

I was commenting on Dateline, not the local police.
Heck, that's kinda why I put that whole quote section at the top of my post. So people would know I was talking about that and not the local sting.
Next time I try to speak to a specific phrase in a blog I'll start:
------->>>>>>I am specifically talking about this quote!
"..."<<<<<<<----------Please remember, what I am typing only has context to this quote! If I type about something else, I'll let you know!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 02/12/2007 - 1:05pm.

Anonymous Source wrote:
Next time I try to speak to a specific phrase in a blog I'll start:
------->>>>>>I am specifically talking about this quote!
"..."<<<<<<<----------Please remember, what I am typing only has context to this quote! If I type about something else, I'll let you know!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Crap... Or I could just use the quote feature. Don't I feel like an ass? Not much of one though.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 1:54am.

Because of a number of reasons.

Even though the guy IM'd the "girl" he hadn't done anything wrong yet.

Was he going to fly down to PDX, who knew till he showed up at the gate in Seatle?

Was he coming down here for business, or to meet the girl?

When he arrived, did he go to where the meet was supposed to happen? Or did he just leave and find a cab.

Until the cuffs went on, it was all a crap shoot. At that point it became news.

Proper Preperation Prevents Poor Performance.

So which station is going to go sting with the Vice guys and bust some Johns? Because they are setup, does that mean each person they shoot is a perp?

Just like that, this was a police action, that a TV station was following. Because of the "time certian" info caused by the planes arrival, it was a chance to setup for a on the sceene coverage.

Heck, they had full live cameras, they could have gone live, but decided to tape delay.

More restranint than some stations would have shown.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 2:04am.

This is how I see it. Yes, KPTV did a story similar to Dateline NBC. No big deal. They executed the story and got it on the air. I watched it, it worked. I applaud them for getting to work with law enforcement agencies on this project. Every station gets a chance to do this. It might not be a cyber sting, but it could be a drug bust, a ride along, who cares. Where there seems to be an issue is how the next day they called the continuation of this story "Breaking News." It wasn't breaking. Instead, KPTV probably should have labeled it "Exclusive". If that happened, I bet we wouldn't be here discussing this.

"The house behind me is totally engulfed in flames. Firefighters from several agencies are trying to get it under control." That's breaking news.

"Police have several blocks cordoned off and are still looking for the suspect in tonight's shooting that occurred in the last half hour." That's breaking news.

"We were the only television station there live at PDX when the creepy guy , who was trying to lure young girls to have sex with him, got off his plane from Seattle" That's an exclusive, but unless the airport is being evacuated or people REALLY REALLY need to know about it, it's NOT breaking news in my eyes.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 4:39am.

If KPTV is so bad, why did everyone else try to follow in their footsteps the next day??!!

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 7:18am.

You're all just jealous that you didn't sit around and make up a story to cover - and call it breaking news! What a bunch of jealous losers, covering stuff that happens instead of just making it happen. It's a lot easier that way. Chumps.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 10:08am.

This was a police operation, not a KPTV operation. We just made the effort to be there to report on it, while the other stations tried to pick up the scraps the next day. What part of that don't you understand?

If it was such a terrible news story, why did everyone else scramble to cover it? Face it- we all cover the same stuff, and this story provides more proof that we're all playing the same game. It's just a question of how well you play it.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 10:30am.

Does any station, reporter or producer in this market have an original idea?

Are you all a bunch of bumbling copycats?

You should all be ashamed of the garbage you put on the air. How about coming up with some stories that really matter?

Submitted by Warner on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 11:46am.

My wife and I were so disgusted by this "story" on the 10PM news on 12, we decided then and there to stop watching this particular broadcast. We like to watch news at 10, so we will now be watching the Channel 8 show on CW. It's not perfect, but better than this. I am also sending the news director and Lee Petik an email describing why they have lost 2 very long time 10:00 News viewers. Not that it will make any difference. But I really object to news organizations creating thier own news, then "covering" it. The whole thing was disgusting. Karrie Tomlinson looked ridiculous. And I like her most of the time.

"What about the girl?"

THERE WAS NO GIRL!

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 12:38pm.

Another key player in all this BS is KPTV's Gen. Manager. IMHO, He's the often-unspoken-of person behind the moral decline of KPTV, so You might want to let him know how you feel too, because i'm sure he's a major driving force behind all the sleaze on their air.
Don't believe me? Ask anyone who works there (if they don't fear for their job they'll tell you... I promise)

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 2:39pm.

The GM arrived at KPTV long after the station's news format went through a dramatic change. He is responsible for boosting revenue at the station, and does it well. He keeps his hands out of news content.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 5:11pm.

The GM was hired long after that ship sailed, although he is helping keep it afloat. The morale decline started with Troy Mcguire who was the architect behind all that KPTV is today. Now he is in position to do the same thing to another PDX station - KATU.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 2:35pm.

KPTV didn't create the news, it was an actual sting, set up by police. KPTV got to watch and record the operation exclusively.
And the fact is, you may not have liked it, but the viewer e-mails thanking us for doing the story prove that there were many other viewers who did.
And another thing, KPTV did this type of story before Dateline ever did.
As far as the "no girl" argument, who cares? He thought there was a girl. They all did, and they all came loaded up with lubricant, condoms and any number of tools of the trade. It's all about the intent, and their intent was crystal clear.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 11:52am.

To the man who wrote "This Story," good luck over on the CW. If you'd read the rest of this thread you would see KGW did the EXACT same story at 10pm, albeit in a less professional and less interesting way. So if you're turning up your nose at KPTV's content you might want to turn off your TV instead.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Mon, 02/12/2007 - 12:16pm.

I got rid of my cable in late January.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 12:32pm.

where to begin? was it news? yes. A man was arrested for traveling across state lines to molest a would be 13 year old. He was arrested in a very public place for what he hoped would be a very private crime. Was it breaking news? Hell no. It was however a great exclusive for Fox and should have been branded as such. Let's put aside the jealously and admit that 12 scooped everyone on this. They didn't scoop because they created this sting. They scooped because they got the cops to trust them enough to be in on it. THIS WAS A LAW ENFORCEMENT OPERATION. I don't work at 12. As much as I wanted to call it a 12 operation, it was a multi-agency law enforcement sting that 12 covered. So is this slime journalism? Maybe in their presentation. I honestly didn't see the final product. I don't pretend to have viewed it. Maybe it was Murrow work. I simply don't know. But was it newsworthy? I think yes. Was it lead material? That's an entirely different argument that will have five different answers for five different people.

With all that said, I was disgusted by a 12 cyber sting story the night before. Tomlinson forcibly questioned a suspect after he was in cuffs and under arrest. His right to leave and not answer her questions was taken away by law enforcement. He was forced to endure her pathetic attempts at gotcha journalism while police stood around him in a circle and waited until she was done. This wasn't a perp walk where he had people shouting at him as he was rushed by. This was a public interrogation. I hope cops read Miranda first or anything he said is out at trial. Police should be ashamed. 12 should be ashamed. And both their lawyers should be ready. If you want to berate a perv, do it like Dateline. That is, before he's been placed under arrest and in handcuffs and had his right to leave the presence of your cameras taken away.

Submitted by Freelancer on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 3:56pm.

Tomlinson questioned someone while they were in custody and in handcuffs? They couldn't get away and the cops let that go?

Wow.

That's cruel and unusual if you ask me.

I hope that guy has a good lawyer, because I would sue the station and the city.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 4:08pm.

Freelancer wrote:
Tomlinson questioned someone while they were in custody and in handcuffs? They couldn't get away and the cops let that go?

Wow.

That's cruel and unusual if you ask me.

I hope that guy has a good lawyer, because I would sue the station and the city.

From what I know of these things, the police give them their Miranda Rights. So you know what, if they don't want to talk to Kerry, they don't have to. In fact the last sting I thought there was a guy they arrested when he showed up and he never said a word when Kerry asked him questions. A good lawyer will not get you out of answering her when you were told you have a right to remain silent.

Submitted by Freelancer on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 5:43pm.

There is a right to remain silent and a right to be subjected to punishment while in custody. I think we can all agree that if watching Tomlinson on TV is bad, being the subject of the questions would be remarkably worse.

This doesn't bother anyone else?

If not, cool. I am glad I'm not in the TV news business -- it's more like selling used cars or snake oil these days.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 02/10/2007 - 11:12am.

See the interrogation for yourself
http://www.kptv.com/video/10937737/index.html

Submitted by bigboy on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 4:02pm.

Picking up stories that other news orgs have broken has been going on since, oh I don't know, forever?

I used to work in a market with a dominant number one (not my station). Whenever we would break a major story, the number one station would pick it up and have us beat by the next newscast.

If it's a story, you cover it. It doesn't matter who broke it. Want proof? Read the Oregonian in the morning, then watch the newscasts that night.

Submitted by Warner on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 5:03pm.

Let me clarify and expand my comment a bit. We aren't turning away from 12 just because of this one story. We are tired of thier overall approach, presentation, emphasis, and sensationalism. We like the anchors, love the weather folks, and even some of the "Final Cut" segments. But, overall, it's just too much crime, fear, and "watches" for us. I know the other stations are also doing some of the same thing, but, you must admit, 12's 10:00 news is doing more. So, we'll try CW. If we don't like that, then we'll probably use the "off" button on the remote and, oh, i don't know, talk to each other?

I do think this has been some nice discussion also.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 5:12pm.

That's my question.

Submitted by Freelancer on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 6:59pm.

For all you barking about how this was a POLICE OPERATION...

From the Oregonian story today:

"For three days starting Feb. 1, decoys posing as 13-year-old girls in online chatrooms invited men to a Wilsonville house, which the Fox television affiliate paid to rent and rigged with broadcast equipment."

So, KPTV paid for the house? Sounds like it wasn't a total police operation after all.

Nice.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 7:53pm.

Great work detective! I guess you missed the part in the stories, on the web and in the teases where they say "FOX 12 teamed up with local law enforcement". They still haven't figured who stole the Lindbergh baby if you want to crack that case.

Yes it was a police operation with the cooperation of a local media orginzation.Usually the cops hate the media so what is wrong with them working together for the greater good. Truth be told they are taking people off the streets who want to hurt children. You people really worry about the wrong things. What would have happened if it wasn't the cops and tomlinson there when those guys came a calling. Would that have been better than some news show running a banner that said breaking news? I'm not gonna argue if that was right or wrong.It seems to be opinion anyway. But, come on people you want some thing to bitch about, bitch about something with real meaning that actually hurts people and screws them up for life. Do you think this is the first time some of these guys have done this? NO it is the first time they were caught. It can't change what these idiots did in the past but maybe it will prevent them from doing it again. And when I think of it like that the petty BS that you people complain about doesn't seem to matter.

I think some of you bash KPTV's cybersting because you are afraid you might get busted yourself in one of the stings.

Side note- Cops read them the miranda rights and in some of the stories they show tomlinson tell the guy you don't have to say anything. Dateline can get away with asking questions beforehand because they do it in places that don't have a two party consent to record audio like Oregon does. And if they are wrong a judge will decide that, not some psych major from Reed college.

Submitted by Freelancer on Sat, 02/10/2007 - 12:51am.

Anonymous 1:41 p.m.: "Not in this sting. It was all law enforcement, federal and local."

Anonymous 9:08 a.m.: "This was a police operation, not a KPTV operation."

Anonymous 1:35 p.m.: "KPTV didn't create the news, it was an actual sting, set up by police. KPTV got to watch and record the operation exclusively."

So, Mr. Kojak watcher, obviously KPTV did a wonderful job letting people know that they were involved with the story. Because many think that it was soley a police operation, when it wasn't. They rented the place -- making them a part of the news instead of just covering it.

So, before you insult people for not reading, might want to try it yourself.

Just saying...

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 02/10/2007 - 8:00am.

They put it out there several times and in some of the earlier stings they even say they rented the house. You people are so tainted with hatred for KPTV you propably didn't want to hear that to begin with.
Insult maybe, but it was clear as day with all the promos and everything else put out. It just shows that some people here hate that station so much they ignore the important details like that. Not my fault. I'm just tired of hearing all the bashing and the hatred you people show for KPTV. Most of you people offer your wonderful opnions and go on to admit you never even seen the segment.That is just conditioned hatred and will go along with whatever the crowd says. Do they do sleazy news sometimes, yes so are all the other stations now. You have a choice watch or don't watch. Someone is watching and as long as there is an audience they will continue to do what they are doing. They are still taking pervs off the street who otherwise would be harming children -could be your sister, daughter, niece, cousin,etc. You people seem to be missing the big picture.
That is what is really sad.

Just saying.....

Submitted by Cablenut on Sat, 02/10/2007 - 10:25am.

I'm just tired of hearing all the bashing and the hatred you people show for KPTV.

No, you aren't "just saying". You are accusing others of a bias, or perhaps you are taking a victim stance on behalf of your station.

You need to read more than just the threads on KPTV, Bro. You will find that the folks on this site take EVERYONE to task...KPTV, KGW, KOIN, KATU, TheO, WW, the Merc, B!x, everone has taken a taste of the bitter from time to time.

I will tell you that we here at the house of OMI lurv us some KPTV, but then again, we lurv us some of most all the news outlets (with the possible exception of Newsmax.) That doesn't mean that 12 doesn't mess up sometimes, and when they do, they catch it just like the others. Don't take it personal: use it as a critique tool. Think of this as a focus group without the cruddy pizza and from intelligent sources.

I, for one, am a bit leery of news taking part in MAKING stories, and this seems like they did just that. Sort of a "Man Bites Dog" feel to it.

AS for taking pervs off the street. These folks aren't "pervs". A "perv" likes whips, blindfolds, leather, maybe some places off Sandy BLVD...these are criminals of the worst kind.

The big picture is that a news crew went in with the police to catch folks who are doing horrible things. Nothing more, nothing less.

-------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: my opinions are my own, not those of OMI or any employer.

Submitted by Freelancer on Sat, 02/10/2007 - 5:47pm.

They should have gone to the police academy, not J-school.

I think it's safe to say I have equal disdain for all TV "news" stations in town, not just KPTV.

The point was that don't come on here saying it was a total police operation, when it obviously wasn't.

That's it.

Kojak.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 02/11/2007 - 2:45pm.

I think it's safe to say I have equal disdain for all TV "news" stations in town, not just KPTV.

Good your not biased or anything!!!

Submitted by Freelancer on Sun, 02/11/2007 - 4:52pm.

At least I gave full disclosure, unlike some who post anonymously.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 02/11/2007 - 6:03pm.

Full disclosure right. You would have a point if you actually gave your real name not call yourself freelancer. Is freelancer your given name? What's your first name;a? Is that your mothers last name or your fathers? Whay nationality is that? Right full disclosure,see making up a name to call yourself online is anynomous.

Submitted by LynnS on Sun, 02/11/2007 - 8:02pm.

You can track what Freelancer has said throughout the site. "Pseudonymous" is the term, I believe.

-----
Lynn Siprelle * Fairy Blogmother

Submitted by Cablenut on Sat, 02/10/2007 - 12:13pm.

Now THAT is a perjorative statement:

I think some of you bash KPTV's cybersting because you are afraid you might get busted yourself in one of the stings.

uhhh...could it be that folks are a little uneasy with the news crews setting up shop with the police for stings, regardless the target? There *are* lofty ideas being bandied about here, and you come off stating that everyone who objects is quilty of a horrible crime?!?!

It is NOT the job of the NEWS to *MAKE* the news. Sorry...leave that to the professionals, then REPORT on it.

The above quote just makes you come off looking like an a-hole, out for the latest "kick" in the ratings war, unconcerned about the direction of journalistic integrity.

-------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: my opinions are my own, not those of OMI or any employer.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 02/11/2007 - 2:34pm.

You really should get a since of humor.

Submitted by LynnS on Sun, 02/11/2007 - 3:16pm.

You I don't. His *sense* of humor works just fine. He married me, for instance!

-----
Lynn Siprelle * Fairy Blogmother

Submitted by Cablenut on Sun, 02/11/2007 - 4:19pm.

I didn't hint that those who question this report were child molesters, Bubba.

You did.

Just a hunch, but I have a feeling that that fact alone kinda gives us a glimpse into your inner fear cycle.

This isn't gonna devolve into a spelling flame, but...I Do Not Think That Word Means What You Think It Means. "sense" is the word you were looking for..."since" is an adverb meaning from a definite past time until now. Which IS ironic, as I had a SENSE of humor SINCE birth, but I have now managed to lose that same SENSE of humor I had SINCE your post.

So Pffffffffft :-P

-------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: my opinions are my own, not those of OMI or any employer.

Submitted by LynnS on Sat, 02/10/2007 - 12:20pm.

Anonymous Source wrote:
I think some of you bash KPTV's cybersting because you are afraid you might get busted yourself in one of the stings.

You must not be any of the folks I know at 12, because I don't think any of them would be foolish enough to make such a statement. You cut your own legs right out from under any argument you might make with that.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 8:08pm.

Figures!

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 8:51pm.

between Dateline NBC and a local newscast. If you don't know the difference --- then you're part of the problem.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 8:18pm.

Portland has finally hit the big-time! (If NBC can do it, why not 'lil ole KPTV?)

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 02/10/2007 - 9:47am.

They won't do their work unless a tevee station is helping them?

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 02/10/2007 - 1:53pm.

Too bad the dude wasn't an Internet pedophile running a meth lab out of an unsanitary roach coach.

Perverted Justice + Meth Lab + Dirty Dining = Now THAT'S Portland TV journalism!

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sat, 02/10/2007 - 5:25pm.

KATU's Mike Hannah (with some help with the teen slang from me) posed as a young teen girl, on the Net, back in 1995, and lured a creepy guy to Portland from Texas. KATU and the cops were at PDX to meet him at the coffee shop there. The suspect worked for an airline, in baggage, and could fly free. I do believe he did a few years.

Great TV, but...

Y-a-w-n!!!!!!!

Shooting slimy fish in a cracked barrel rigged with lipstick cams while unsophisticated, bored viewers recoil in fear... and reach for the popcorn... meantime... Little Emmy Lou Who is all grown up... at 15... alone in her room upstairs... in seven chat rooms... using three aliases... arranging her own hookup for... fill in the blank.

And they say 9/11 killed irony.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Wed, 02/14/2007 - 2:13pm.

Really? You don't know if if pedophelia is worse than bad/sensational journalism? Wow. Ask a victim.

Submitted by Anonymous Source (not verified) on Sun, 02/18/2007 - 4:36pm.

KPTV is doing the community a service.
Does anyone have Kerry Tomlinson's email? I've got a deep seated scolding fetish.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Voting controls can be added to this post.
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
More information about formatting options